Re: Ill-effects of a posting greater than 64k

Article View: news.admin

Article #3165

#3165

From: mathew
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 1992 12:47

10 lines
703 bytes

barr@pop.psu.edu (David Barr) writes:
> In article <1992Sep26.151349.1962@psg.com> randy@psg.com (Randy Bush) writes:
> >Fix the broken software.  Adhere to and enforce standards.
> 
> Okay, I propose we make 64K the standard.

Seconded.


mathew

Technical Details

Message-ID: <J3FRRB21w165w@mantis.co.uk>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!stl!robobar!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew

References: <1jr1Hps&y9@atlantis.psu.edu>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!europa.asd.contel.com!darwin.sura.net!wupost!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!ames!agate!doc.ic.ac.uk!uknet!stl!robobar!ibmpcug!mantis!mathew
From: mathew@mantis.co.uk (mathew)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Re: Ill-effects of a posting greater than 64k
Message-ID: <J3FRRB21w165w@mantis.co.uk>
Date: 27 Sep 92 12:47:54 GMT
References: <1jr1Hps&y9@atlantis.psu.edu>
Organization: Mantis Consultants, Cambridge. UK.
Lines: 10

Reply to Parent Message