🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: news.admin
Article #3255

Guidelines discussion: RFD

#3255
From: Richard M. Hartman
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 19:10
22 lines
1407 bytes
The (rather large and vociferous) discusison about the rec.music.synth
thing has spawned one legitimate question that I can tell (and, no, I
don't think it should invalidated the outcome of a vote taken under
the guidelines as they stood at the time.  ex post facto and all that...)

Is a msg w/ the subject line "RFD: ...." a sufficiently clear means
of notifying a group about a change that may affect them?  The initials
RFD, CFV etc are clear to the news admins in new.groups who have read
the guidelines and are watching for such things.  But using INITIALS
to try and get the point across to a bunch of musicians that got on
the net to talk about synthesizers may not be clear.

Should the messages that are posted to the affected groups have
more detailed, unobfuscated "Subject:" lines?  e.g. (1/2 :) ) :

	> Subject: Your news group may be renamed!!! Speak up NOW!

		-Richard Hartman
		hartman@ulogic.COM

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <567@ulogic.UUCP>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!ulogic!hartman
References: <VPyuTB2w165w@momad.UUCP>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!ulogic!hartman
From: hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman)
Newsgroups: news.admin
Subject: Guidelines discussion: RFD
Keywords: Pornography Legal Child Porn
Message-ID: <567@ulogic.UUCP>
Date: 7 Nov 92 19:10:09 GMT
References: <VPyuTB2w165w@momad.UUCP>
Organization: negligable
Lines: 23