Article View: news.admin
Article #3255Guidelines discussion: RFD
From: Richard M. Hartman
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 19:10
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 1992 19:10
22 lines
1407 bytes
1407 bytes
The (rather large and vociferous) discusison about the rec.music.synth thing has spawned one legitimate question that I can tell (and, no, I don't think it should invalidated the outcome of a vote taken under the guidelines as they stood at the time. ex post facto and all that...) Is a msg w/ the subject line "RFD: ...." a sufficiently clear means of notifying a group about a change that may affect them? The initials RFD, CFV etc are clear to the news admins in new.groups who have read the guidelines and are watching for such things. But using INITIALS to try and get the point across to a bunch of musicians that got on the net to talk about synthesizers may not be clear. Should the messages that are posted to the affected groups have more detailed, unobfuscated "Subject:" lines? e.g. (1/2 :) ) : > Subject: Your news group may be renamed!!! Speak up NOW! -Richard Hartman hartman@ulogic.COM =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Practice random kindness and senseless acts of beauty.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<567@ulogic.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!ulogic!hartmanReferences:
<VPyuTB2w165w@momad.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!ulogic!hartman From: hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Guidelines discussion: RFD Keywords: Pornography Legal Child Porn Message-ID: <567@ulogic.UUCP> Date: 7 Nov 92 19:10:09 GMT References: <VPyuTB2w165w@momad.UUCP> Organization: negligable Lines: 23