🚀 go-pugleaf

dave@jato.jpl.nasa.gov (Dave Hayes) writes:

>Your opinion. The central argument I've had...none of you have touched. 
>I'll say it again: "what about the users of rec.music.synth? Don't you care
>about them?"

They got 3 CFV posted to their group which stated exactly how to make
their opinion known to the votetaker. Some did that, some didn't. The
majority was in favour of the rename (even a 2/3 majority).

>>The process was completely open to participation from anyone who was affected.
>>Those who chose to participate were listened to. Those who chose not to were
>>not. It's really that simple.

>Blatantly false. I participated and I'm not being listened to. If you really
>listened to what I was saying, then you'd deal with my central issue (see
>above). You haven't as of yet. 

Many have listended to you, most have shaken their head at the nonsense you
have been pouring into the net lately. And we have dealt with your central
"issue", despite you started out with other complaints.
-- 
Jesper Lauridsen        |  I survived the rec.arts.sf-lovers split
rorschak@daimi.aau.dk   |