🚀 go-pugleaf

>Newsgroups: news.admin,news.admin.policy,rec.music.synth
					 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

	What no rec.music.makers.synth?  Seems like you are deliberately
trying to bias your poll by leaving out people who have made the switch and
therefore see no need to follow all the news.* groups anymore.  Which they
shouldn't until a valid RFD appears in news.announce.newgroups.  (which is
unclear at this point.)  And in any case, following news.admin.* would
generally not be required anyway.  News.groups is the place for such
discussion.

					Bill Bogstad

[I've added rec.music.makers.synth to this and included the full article
below so that readers of that group can participate in your "poll".]

In article <EMCGUIRE.92Nov15175242@fuller.intellection.com> emcguire@intellection.com (Ed McGuire) writes:
>Please reply by mail to the mailbox <ed@intellection.com>.
>
>1.  Do you read rec.music.synth?
>	(yes/no)
>
>2.  On the issue of rec.music.synth renaming, do you
>	(a) strongly favor rec.music.synth, please proceed with revote
>	(b) strongly favor rec.music.makers.synth, please leave as is
>	(c) strongly favor dropping the dispute, please leave me alone
>	(d) not care as long as a synth group exists
>-- 
>Ed McGuire                   1603 LBJ Freeway, Suite 780
>Systems Administrator/       Dallas, Texas 75234
> Member of Technical Staff   214/620-2100, FAX 214/484-8110
>Intellection, Inc.           <ed@intellection.com>