🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <9211191517.47@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes:
>
[about child porn/porn/obscenity definitions]

>I have enough doubts about this, that I would not gate a.b.p.e through
>my system.  If the state authorities confiscated my system as evidence,
>I would expect to never see it again, whether I won in court or not.
>

   All that can be said here is that it is a very sad case when a person
refrains from an action that they might otherwise take because of a fear
of the effects of a wrongful prosecution. Very sad.

   Isn't it true that the seizure of property in these cases (video stores
included) (and in the USA) are based on the RICO (organized crime) laws?
Am I the only one that thinks that applying RICO laws to video stores is
wrong? 

DanZ

-- 
This article is for entertainment purposes only. Any facts, opinions,
narratives or ideas contained herein are not necessarily true, and do
not necessarily represent the views of any particular person.