Article View: news.admin
Article #3780Re: What is pornography, anyway?
From: Richard M. Hartman
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:19
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 21:19
17 lines
1235 bytes
1235 bytes
In article <9211191517.47@rmkhome.UUCP> rmk@rmkhome.UUCP (Rick Kelly) writes: >I had email from the former sysop of Doug's Den. His equipment was >confiscated, he was found to be innocent, but his equipment has never >been returned. Q: are we assuming the authorities automatically are supposed to return evidence from whence it came (computers or not, I'm talking generically) or does the owner of the evidence have to make some sort of application after the case has been resolved? If the latter, has the sysop of Doug's Den gone in and filled out whatever paperwork may be required? =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Philosopher and plowman | each must know his part | -Richard Hartman to build a new mentality | hartman@uLogic.COM closer to the heart! |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<644@ulogic.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!ulogic!hartmanReferences:
<9211180027.36@rmkhome.UUCP> <BxxAKw.4xr@cs.uiuc.edu> <9211191517.47@rmkhome.UUCP>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!decwrl!netcomsv!ulogic!hartman From: hartman@ulogic.UUCP (Richard M. Hartman) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.admin.policy Subject: Re: What is pornography, anyway? Message-ID: <644@ulogic.UUCP> Date: 23 Nov 92 21:19:19 GMT References: <9211180027.36@rmkhome.UUCP> <BxxAKw.4xr@cs.uiuc.edu> <9211191517.47@rmkhome.UUCP> Followup-To: news.admin Organization: negligable Lines: 18