🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <4164@sdcrdcf.UUCP> lwall@sdcrdcf.UUCP (Larry Wall) writes:
->> In article <646@pedsgo.UUCP> evan@pedsgo.UUCP writes:
->> <Also, when reading, if I post a followup to a message, that message does
->> <not get marked as read until I go back and reread it.  This is annoying.
->In article <1523@nicmad.UUCP> brown@nicmad.UUCP (Mr. Video) replies:
->> Ya, I have noticed that too.  Maybe Larry should consider this a bug and
->> send out a patch for it.  For now we are just going to have to look
->> at it again to get it marked.

->This has been considered before.  The conventional wisdom seems to be that
->you don't have any business posting a followup to an article you haven't read.

Huh?  If I followup to an article, it's because I read it (of course!).
The problem I have is that after I do, and then Followup to it, the article
is still marked unread! (I posted the original question.)  I agree, you
don't have any business followingup to an article you haven't read; why
would anybody want to do this?????  And, what has that got to do with my
question?
-- 
WHO: Evan L. Marcus                         ||  "All my life I wanted to be
WHAT: Concurrent Computer Corporation,      ||   someone; I guess I should
WHERE: Tinton Falls, NJ                     ||   have been more specific."
HOW: {topaz|hjuxa|vax135}!petsd!pedsgo!evan ||       -- Jane Wagner