🚀 go-pugleaf

In <1992Nov1.193005.26012@CSD-NewsHost.Stanford.EDU> paulf@umunhum.stanford.edu (Paul Flaherty) writes:

>Well, at this point, John Haugh has offended me more than John DeArmond by
>posting email without the writer's permission.

Well, that's awfully silly of you!  If there's no explicit
agreement regarding non-disclosure, received e-mail is the property
of the recipient to do with as he wishes.

If you feel you must communicate with someone who might not treat
your e-mail to him as confidential, perhaps you should phone him up
and use a phony name.  Or, better yet, just keep your mouth shut,
thus properly insuring the confidentiality of what you wish to keep
confidential.  

It is beyond question that the recipient of unsolicited mail has
the right to let others know what he has received.
-- 
 Irving_Wolfe@Happy-Man.com      Happy Man Corp.  206/463-9399 x101
 4410 SW Pt. Robinson Rd., Vashon Island, WA  98070-7399   fax x108
 We publish SOLID VALUE for the intelligent investor.   NextMail OK
Info free; sample $20.  Send POSTAL addrs: Solid-Value@Happy-Man.com