Article View: news.admin
Article #8248Re: comp.os.os2 <---> FidoNET gateway
From: Craig Jackson drilex1
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 14:23
Date: Tue, 06 Feb 1990 14:23
18 lines
1344 bytes
1344 bytes
Although the volume in comp.os.os2 has gone up a great deal since the
gateway opened, I don't believe that the chatter level has. Indeed, most
of the 'chatter' discussion has been directed from the Fidonet side
towards the Usenet side. I have seen a 'Hi ,Joe' message from Fidonet, but
those sorts of messages aren't unknown to Usenet. The Fidonet people
have been complaining about blathery .signatures, which is a problem
endemic to Usenet.
The Fidonet people have noted that most of Fidonet's long-haul links are
paid for by private citizens. This has never been true for Usenet;
although more personal Unix boxes are out there than ever before, I suspect
that few privately-paid long-haul links have resulted. (I know many systems
call uunet. How many use non-business dollars to receive a significant
news feed?)
--
Craig Jackson
dricejb@drilex.dri.mgh.com
{bbn,axiom,redsox,atexnet,ka3ovk}!drilex!{dricej,dricejb}
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<8257@drilex.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!bbn!drilex!dricejbReferences:
<2435@uvaarpa.virginia.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!think!snorkelwacker!mit-eddie!bbn!drilex!dricejb From: dricejb@drilex.UUCP (Craig Jackson drilex1) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Re: comp.os.os2 <---> FidoNET gateway Message-ID: <8257@drilex.UUCP> Date: 6 Feb 90 14:23:07 GMT References: <2435@uvaarpa.virginia.edu> Organization: DRI/McGraw-Hill, Lexington, MA Lines: 18