Article View: news.admin
Article #8314Fidonet, gateways etc
From: Bob Palowoda
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1990 09:00
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1990 09:00
25 lines
1548 bytes
1548 bytes
Ok, first off a week ago I made the following statement.
VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV
> This is not the place to discuss network routeing. I read this newsgroup
> to find out about OS2. If you want to discuss network crap go do it in
> news.newsgroups.
After that time I sure got alot of mail that people did not like what
I said. If I offend anyone by this statement you have my public apology.
Also I really don't think network routeing is "crap". I have to deal
with it every day on my own system.
However I still don't think public opinion is needed any longer if the
gateway should be established or not. One, it seems to be established
already. Two it seems to be working. To me it just seems to be silly
to even hint at working backwards. So maybe I should ask what's the
real problem?
---Bob
--
Bob Palowoda pacbell!indetech!palowoda *Home of Fiver BBS* login: bbs
Home {sun|daisy}!ys2!fiver!palowoda (415)-623-8809 1200/2400
Work {sun|pyramid|decwrl}!megatest!palowoda (415)-623-8806 2400/9600/19200 TB
Voice: (415)-623-7495 Public access UNIX XBBS
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<994@fiver.UUCP>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!decwrl!ames!pacbell!indetech!fiver!palowodaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!decwrl!ames!pacbell!indetech!fiver!palowoda From: palowoda@fiver.UUCP (Bob Palowoda) Newsgroups: news.admin Subject: Fidonet, gateways etc Message-ID: <994@fiver.UUCP> Date: 15 Feb 90 09:00:12 GMT Reply-To: palowoda@fiver.UUCP (Bob Palowoda) Organization: Fiver Communications, Fremont, Ca Lines: 25