🚀 go-pugleaf

In the referenced article, jba@harald.ruc.dk (Jan B. Andersen) writes:
> > I sent mail and got back an answer indicating complete indifference to
> > the fact that he is flooding the world with these control messages.
> 
> Should we begin to flood his/her's (sob@bmc.tmc.edu) mailbox for a change?

Please do not flame sob@bmc.tmc.edu (Stan Barber).  Besides being the
moderator of comp.sys.concurrent, he has made significant
contributions to the Usenet software (e.g., porting NNTP) and has been
an active, helpful Net citizen for a long time.

Stan posted an article explaining the masscomp-->concurrent newsgroup
name change and explained that it was gone over in the c.s.masscomp
newsgroup.  That article may not have reached your site yet.  I agree
that the rmgroup was somewhat confusing, especially since it issued
from "bmc!usenet" instead of (say) "sob@tmc.edu", but I think the
issue is sufficiently explained at this point (though there is still
the problem of the mailpaths backbone sites).

--
Michael C. Berch  
mcb@presto.ig.com / uunet!presto.ig.com!mcb / ames!bionet!mcb