Article View: news.admin
Article #8403Re: Purchasing a Hierarchy
From: Keith "Justified And Ancient" Co...
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 1994 16:01
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 1994 16:01
48 lines
3389 bytes
3389 bytes
[Follow-up trimmed. Have a nice day.] In article <CuHsvM.DBB@clarinet.com>, Brad Templeton <brad@clarinet.com> wrote: >Jens Stark <root@foobar.hanse.de> wrote: >>What keeps me - a pretty normal net.citizen from sending out a newgroup >>for market.* ? O.K. - rmgroups by god-knows-who. Netiquette. But LAWS ? > >Trademark laws vary from country to country, so I can't speak for where >you live. In the USA. > >a) Rob announced plans for a market hierarchy where he would sell >advertising, and worked to get this covered in other media as well. He >thus established some awareness of the name, though he has not yet >created the hierarchy. > >b) If you were to create such a group, he could argue that your doing so >would cause confusion between the groups you created and his, and that >this would hurt the value of his. He could thus sue you for >trademark infringement. > >However, this is clouded by the fact that: > >a) He has yet to create the groups, and they're a bit overdue > >b) He's selling his rights in the name to somebody else > >c) The term "market" is arguably a generic term. Ie. one might even >use the sentence, "misc.forsale is a market newsgroup." > >It would be up to him whether to sue. A "clari" group on the other hand >is something that: > a) Has a clear commercial value and name recognition > b) Has existed for over five years > c) Is not a generic term in any sense. > >And thus there is a much stronger trademark case for us. There's one other problem. If your trademark becomes a "generic term", you will lose your trademark. That's why Xerox got so bent out of shape years ago and started telling people "not every photocopier is a Xerox". I don't think "market.*" is trademarketable in any sense of the word. "DNetMarket.*", on the other hand... -- =kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC= =My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza. OK???= = "He was my strongest weakness." =
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<32lf54$3sn@nyx10.cs.du.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mailReferences:
<3265q2$gqc@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM> <Cu94n6.8En@clarinet.com> <32fb75$244@foobar.hanse.de> <CuHsvM.DBB@clarinet.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1052e3,b24e8d9e0112a74 X-Google-Attributes: gid1052e3,public X-Google-Thread: f9437,b24e8d9e0112a74 X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,d9c57bfc6fd1a6a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid1038e3,public X-Google-Thread: 1157da,b24e8d9e0112a74 X-Google-Attributes: gid1157da,public X-Google-Thread: 1154f5,b24e8d9e0112a74 X-Google-Attributes: gid1154f5,public X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,b24e8d9e0112a74 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-14 10:18:26 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mail From: kcochran@nyx10.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran) Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups,ba.news,alt.internet.services,news.misc,misc.legal Subject: Re: Purchasing a Hierarchy Followup-To: news.admin,news.groups,alt.internet.services Date: 14 Aug 1994 10:01:40 -0600 Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci. Lines: 48 Message-ID: <32lf54$3sn@nyx10.cs.du.edu> References: <3265q2$gqc@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM> <Cu94n6.8En@clarinet.com> <32fb75$244@foobar.hanse.de> <CuHsvM.DBB@clarinet.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: nyx10.cs.du.edu