🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: news.admin
Article #8403

Re: Purchasing a Hierarchy

#8403
From: Keith "Justified And Ancient" Co...
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 1994 16:01
48 lines
3389 bytes
[Follow-up trimmed.  Have a nice day.]

In article <CuHsvM.DBB@clarinet.com>, Brad Templeton <brad@clarinet.com> wrote:
>Jens Stark <root@foobar.hanse.de> wrote:
>>What keeps me - a pretty normal net.citizen from sending out a newgroup
>>for market.* ? O.K. - rmgroups by god-knows-who. Netiquette. But LAWS ?
>
>Trademark laws vary from country to country, so I can't speak for where
>you live.  In the USA.
>
>a) Rob announced plans for a market hierarchy where he would sell
>advertising, and worked to get this covered in other media as well.  He
>thus established some awareness of the name, though he has not yet
>created the hierarchy.
>
>b) If you were to create such a group, he could argue that your doing so
>would cause confusion between the groups you created and his, and that
>this would hurt the value of his.  He could thus sue you for
>trademark infringement.
>
>However, this is clouded by the fact that:
>
>a) He has yet to create the groups, and they're a bit overdue
>
>b) He's selling his rights in the name to somebody else
>
>c) The term "market" is arguably a generic term.   Ie. one might even
>use the sentence, "misc.forsale is a market newsgroup."
>
>It would be up to him whether to sue.   A "clari" group on the other hand
>is something that:
>	a) Has a clear commercial value and name recognition
>	b) Has existed for over five years
>	c) Is not a generic term in any sense.
>
>And thus there is a much stronger trademark case for us.

There's one other problem.  If your trademark becomes a "generic term",
you will lose your trademark.  That's why Xerox got so bent out of shape
years ago and started telling people "not every photocopier is a Xerox".

I don't think "market.*" is trademarketable in any sense of the word.

"DNetMarket.*", on the other hand...
-- 
=kcochran@nyx.cs.du.edu | B(0-4) c- d- e++ f- g++ k(+) m r(-) s++(+) t | TSAKC=
=My thoughts, my posts, my ideas, my responsibility, my beer, my pizza.  OK???=
=                       "He was my strongest weakness."                       =
Technical Details
Message-ID: <32lf54$3sn@nyx10.cs.du.edu>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mail
References: <3265q2$gqc@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM> <Cu94n6.8En@clarinet.com> <32fb75$244@foobar.hanse.de> <CuHsvM.DBB@clarinet.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 1052e3,b24e8d9e0112a74
X-Google-Attributes: gid1052e3,public
X-Google-Thread: f9437,b24e8d9e0112a74
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public
X-Google-Thread: 1038e3,d9c57bfc6fd1a6a,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid1038e3,public
X-Google-Thread: 1157da,b24e8d9e0112a74
X-Google-Attributes: gid1157da,public
X-Google-Thread: 1154f5,b24e8d9e0112a74
X-Google-Attributes: gid1154f5,public
X-Google-Thread: fc7b2,b24e8d9e0112a74
X-Google-Attributes: gidfc7b2,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-08-14 10:18:26 PST
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!redstone.interpath.net!ddsw1!news.kei.com!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx10.cs.du.edu!not-for-mail
From: kcochran@nyx10.cs.du.edu (Keith "Justified And Ancient" Cochran)
Newsgroups: news.admin,news.groups,ba.news,alt.internet.services,news.misc,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Purchasing a Hierarchy
Followup-To: news.admin,news.groups,alt.internet.services
Date: 14 Aug 1994 10:01:40 -0600
Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci.
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <32lf54$3sn@nyx10.cs.du.edu>
References: <3265q2$gqc@engnews1.Eng.Sun.COM> <Cu94n6.8En@clarinet.com> <32fb75$244@foobar.hanse.de> <CuHsvM.DBB@clarinet.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: nyx10.cs.du.edu