Article View: news.future
Article #1Re: Public Keys (was: Elections!)
From: Marc Thibault
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 12:14
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1992 12:14
51 lines
3086 bytes
3086 bytes
In article <Bwq6DM.AC0@immd4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
(Markus Kuhn) writes:
....
> Using encription or signature keys (even public ones) makes only sense,
> if they are distributed over a system completely independent from the
> system used for transporting the message. Otherwise intermediate nodes
Here we go again! Read My Lips: Routinely published public
keys are for _privacy_. If you have deep, dark secrets to
protect, by all means, use a multi-channel key management
protocol.
On the other hand, if you don't think you are likely to be the
target of a very expensive intercept operation, if you don't
want everybody in every computer room along the Internet
(including your boss and the loud-mouthed kid they just hired
as email sysadmin on your site) reading your mail, and if you
don't want your messages routinely scanned for key words by a
half-dozen lettered agencies on fishing expeditions, publish a
public key.
Every so often, find a separate channel to check that your
published key is in fact the one you sent (log in as 'guest'
to a FreeNet host, or have a friend at another site print off
one of your postings). If it doesn't match, call your lawyer;
you are probably in very deep doo-doo with some very powerful
people.
For you 'security experts' out there: Try to see through your
paranoid fog long enough to understand that there's more than
one use for crypto. Every one of you knows that a locked door
won't keep out a determined burglar - but you lock your doors
anyway. Published keys work the same way: they make sure that
an invasion of privacy takes extraordinary measures that are
likely to be detected.
---
Marc Thibault | Consulting Systems Analyst | The PC: Colt '45
marc@tanda.isis.org | R.R.1, Oxford Mills, | of the information
CIS:71441,2226 | Ontario, Canada K0G 1S0 | frontier
NC FreeNet: aa185 | |
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.0
mQBNAiqxYTkAAAECALfeHYp0yC80s1ScFvJSpj5eSCAO+hihtneFrrn+vuEcSavh
AAUwpIUGyV2N8n+lFTPnnLc42Ms+c8PJUPYKVI8ABRG0I01hcmMgVGhpYmF1bHQg
PG1hcmNAdGFuZGEuaXNpcy5vcmc+
=HLnv
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<557254670DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!cunews!revcan!micor!uuisis!tanda!marcReferences:
<1992Oct20.215740.21429@cs.brown.edu> <FRANL.92Oct21001115@draco.centerline.com> <626070020DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org> <1992Oct24.160943.14569@w8hd.org> onsnorenscify commands that should be executed when one Eof the following function keys is prShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!torn!cunews!revcan!micor!uuisis!tanda!marc From: marc@tanda.isis.org (Marc Thibault) Reply-To: marc@tanda.isis.org Newsgroups: news.future Subject: Re: Public Keys (was: Elections!) Message-ID: <557254670DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org> References: <1992Oct20.215740.21429@cs.brown.edu> <FRANL.92Oct21001115@draco.centerline.com> <626070020DN5.61R@tanda.isis.org> <1992Oct24.160943.14569@w8hd.org> onsnorenscify commands that should be executed when one Eof the following function keys is pr Date: Tue, 27 Oct 92 08:14:33 EDT Distribution: na Organization: Thibault & Friends Lines: 53