Article View: news.software.b
Article #2294Trn discussions better suited to mailing list?
From: Dominic Dunlop
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 1990 11:25
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 1990 11:25
19 lines
1441 bytes
1441 bytes
First off, this type of posting has been known to be counter-productive through the spawning of a lot of traffic discussing the posting. Can I ask you to post responses ONLY if you're currently using trn? (I'm not.) Thanks. I'm glad to see that trn has reached the stage of being beaten on by sites public-spirited enough to nominate themselves as testers. Thanks to all concerned. I'll just sit back and reap the benefits later -- as, I'm sure, will many readers of this newsgroup! However, IMHO, the comparatively small number of sites doing this testing would be better served by a mail list rather than by posting to this newsgroup. It just is not necessary to discuss in public the problems which the testing is indended to bring to light: the public just doesn't need to know! Once the test sites have done their worst, and trn is officially posted, then will be the time to start discussing its subtleties in this forum. -- Dominic Dunlop
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Aug10.112524.14030@tsa.co.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utstat!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!tsa!domoShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utstat!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!mcsun!ukc!axion!tsa!domo From: domo@tsa.co.uk (Dominic Dunlop) Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: Trn discussions better suited to mailing list? Summary: IMHO, not appropriate to public forum prior to official release Message-ID: <1990Aug10.112524.14030@tsa.co.uk> Date: 10 Aug 90 11:25:24 GMT Reply-To: domo@tsa.co.uk (Dominic Dunlop) Organization: The Standard Answer Ltd. Lines: 19