Article View: news.software.b
Article #4761Re: What is the advantage of INN over CNews?
From: Matthias Urlichs
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 19:42
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 1992 19:42
46 lines
2810 bytes
2810 bytes
In news.software.b, article <1992Dec15.175743.9862@dragon.acadiau.ca>, peter@dragon.acadiau.ca (Peter Steele) writes: > > So, if we get our news via a single 56K baud line, we shouldn't > consider INN? Does our feader site also need INN running, or is Yes you should. ;-) > it independent of what the feeder site uses. Right now we're running It's standard NNTP. Thus, feeder-independent. > cnews and get our news in batches via nntpsend every 20 minutes. > I'm hanging off a 16.8k line (the wonders of Zyxel ;-) and get a continuous feed via nntplink. > On another note, INN *must* have more going for it than just what > is described above. What other reasons might make it worthwhile to > switch to INN. Lots. - Central control.If you say "ctlinnd mode" and "running" comes back, then you know your News system is up and OK, no further questions necessary. - No lock files. The daemon remembers its state. - Direct posting. As soon as inews returns, you know your article entered the News system and was spooled to other sites. - More than one concurrent incoming feed. (Right now, I've got two rnews jobs, two incoming NNTP feeds, and an inews active. They don't block one another and all get instant and reliable feedback on the articles they deliver.) - Reworked "newsfeeds" (nee sys) file with much finer control as to what actually gets written to batch files. - Directly feed the batch into a program, via pipe. People have been seeing article transfer times on the order of 200 msec, using this method to feed another system via nntplink. - Combine the previous two to do some really ugly things like statistics gathering or sendsys-bomb cancelling. Especially the latter isn't really doable, given the above subsecond transfer times, unless you can get the Cancel into your news server _right_now_. - One INN system can mirror another INN system. No more problems with renumbered articles -> instant switchover when the primary server fails and/or when it is temporarily overworked. - Doubtless some other things I've forgotten. -- Matthias Urlichs -- urlichs@smurf.sub.org -- urlichs@smurf.ira.uka.de /(o\ Humboldtstrasse 7 -- 7500 Karlsruhe 1 -- Germany -- +49-721-9612521 \o)/
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1glceaINNkik@smurf.smurf.sub.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!newsReferences:
<1ghab1INNcko@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> <1gkvdlINN2me@rodan.UU.NET> <1992Dec15.175743.9862@dragon.acadiau.ca>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!qt.cs.utexas.edu!yale.edu!ira.uka.de!smurf.sub.org!news From: urlichs@smurf.sub.org (Matthias Urlichs) Newsgroups: news.software.b Subject: Re: What is the advantage of INN over CNews? Date: 15 Dec 1992 20:42:02 +0100 Organization: University of Karlsruhe, FRG Lines: 46 Message-ID: <1glceaINNkik@smurf.smurf.sub.org> References: <1ghab1INNcko@uniwa.uwa.edu.au> <1gkvdlINN2me@rodan.UU.NET> <1992Dec15.175743.9862@dragon.acadiau.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 Keywords: inn cnews