🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <1992Dec17.131639.18996@unipalm.co.uk>, ian@unipalm.co.uk (Ian Phillipps) writes:
|> tale@ten.uu.net (David C Lawrence) writes:
|> 
|> With feeds set up as follows:
|> 
|> doc.ic.ac.uk\
|> 	:*\
|> 	:Tc,Wnm,Fnews.doc.ic.ac.uk\
|> 	:/home/local/news/bin/nntplink news.doc.ic.ac.uk
|> 
|> I.e. the nntplink and inn "share" a spooling/batching file.
|> 
|> I'm seeing the following scenario, which occurs when there is some
|> delay sending articles to a remote site:
|> 
|> 
|> Dec 17 11:13:57 pipe innd: doc.ic.ac.uk:19:proc:18568 cant flush count 5754 Operation would block
|> Dec 17 11:13:57 pipe innd: doc.ic.ac.uk dataloss 5754

I've seen exactly the same problems when trying this setup and I might have
found a working solution for it :

Try setting up the feed as :

doc.ic.ac.uk\
	:*\
	:Tc,Wnm,S1024,Fnews.doc.ic.ac.uk\
	:/home/local/news/bin/nntplink news.doc.ic.ac.uk

I've seen the following messages with this setup :

Dec 17 15:15:25 disaster innd: testsite:20:proc:9384 blocked sleeping 240
Dec 17 15:17:20 disaster innd: testsite spooling 1055 bytes

Which looks like innd is really spooling the articles to the file
specified with 'F'...
 
|> Is it safe to make innd and nntplink share spooling/batching files like this?

Good question - that's exactly what I'd like to know also ...

|> If not, how should I join these two programs?

???

	Chris Schmidt

  ===    ____                          ===       EUnet Deutschland GmbH
  ===   /      /   /   ___    ___  _/_ ===       News-Support
  ===  /----  /   /  /   /  /___/  /   ===       Emil-Figge-Str. 80
  === /____  /___/  /   /  /___   /    ===       D-W-4600 Dortmund 50, Germany
  =====                              =====       Tel. +49 231 755 2444
  ===== Connecting Europe since 1982 =====       Fax  +49 231 755 2386