Article View: news.software.notes
Article #96Re: Evolutionary dead end?
From: Rich Salz
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1987 15:38
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1987 15:38
19 lines
1333 bytes
1333 bytes
Bob Berger asked if notes is an evolutionary dead-end. I think so. Too bad, because (at least for local groups) the interface is hard to beat. (For Usenet-wide newsgroups, rn is best.) Part of the reason for this is that it goes against one of the main tenets of the Unix philosophy -- a basically-text database is stored in binary form. This means things like heterogenous NFS sharing takes great pain. If notes is to expand and grow, it's gotta leverage off the work everyone else is doing for regular netnews. The best way for this to happen is for someone to write a "newsnotes" program that reads articles in the /usr/spool/news/comp/sources/unix/123 scheme, but with the aide of the special index file /usr/spool/news/comp/sources/unix/.nnindex to create things like the index page and time-sorted basenote/response chains. If anyone's interested in such a project, I'll help chit-chat, but I'm already way too overcommitted. /r$ -- For comp.sources.unix stuff, mail to sources@uunet.uu.net.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<276@fig.bbn.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!bbn.com!rsalzReferences:
<107300003@datacube>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!bbn!bbn.com!rsalz From: rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) Newsgroups: news.software.notes Subject: Re: Evolutionary dead end? Message-ID: <276@fig.bbn.com> Date: 28 Dec 87 15:38:03 GMT References: <107300003@datacube> Organization: BBN Laboratories, Cambridge MA Lines: 19