🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: nj.general
Article #33

Re: NJ Aquarium ?

#33
From: noname
Date: Mon, 06 Apr 1992 13:39
50 lines
2910 bytes
In article <1992Apr4.004758.95620@drew.drew.edu> ropochin@drew.drew.edu writes:
>In article <1992Apr3.221310.3625@porthos.cc.bellcore.com>, mike@nyquist.bellcore.com (Mike Lukacs 21341) writes:
>> In article <Apr.3.13.54.04.1992.15568@pilot.njin.net> mla@pilot.njin.net (Marc L. Appelbaum) writes:
>>>In article <1992Apr3.162523.8564@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> wuu@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (john.t.wuu) writes:
>>>
>>>> Have you been to the New Jersey aquarium in Camden(sp?) ?
>>>> Is it worthwhile to visit ?
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> 
>>>> John T. Wuu	wuu@mink.att.com 
>>>> 
>>>> ******** Standard Disclaimer :-) ***********
>>>Yes, I was there last week.  It's nice.  A lot of exhibits for school
>>>aged children.  The adult admission is $ 8.50, parking is $ 4.00 for
>>>up to three hours.
>> 
>> 
>> There is also a very nice new aquarium at Point Pleasant Beach on the 
>> boardwalk.  This one is cheaper, and closer to you if you are at 
>> Holmdel/Lincroft/Middletown/etc., but doesn't get as much press
>> because it is a private venture.
>> 
>> DISCLAIMER:  The opinions expressed    | M. E. Lukacs  NVC-3X-330
>> in the above are my own, and not       | Digital Video Research
>> those of Bell Communications Research. | Bell Communications Research(BELLCORE)
>> By Law, BELLCORE may not have such     | 331 Newman Springs Road
>> opinions; and if they did, they would  | Red Bank, New Jersey 07701-7040
>> not tell you for free.  And I am not   | (908) 758-2876 FAX: 758-4371
>> the person who would be giving out     |
>> official opinions anyway.  And unless  | mike@nyquist.bellcore.com
>> you can PROVE that this isn't a        | "First 'mike' on the UUCP network"
>> forgery, I did not say this.           |       (ca.1974)
>I work at the amusement park owned by the same private venture and I 
>know how much money (lots) went into it. They got some new seals this 
>winter and they're really cool. (No, I get no commission for saying 
>this.) 
>Also Point Pleasant Beach is a lot nicer than Camden.
>
>Roy

  
I went to NJ aquarium (Camden) yesterday. I was quite disappointed. If nobody
tells you, probably you would think that it is a ten years old layout/design.
Even though the building is new. But think about the amount of State money 
spent for the (new) building and the ticket price.
Please note that the children strollers
are not allowed in the Camden aquarium building.     
  
Kevin
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1992Apr6.133909.21796@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!princeton!att!cbnews!cbnewsl!noname
References: <Apr.3.13.54.04.1992.15568@pilot.njin.net> <1992Apr3.221310.3625@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> <1992Apr4.004758.95620@drew.drew.edu>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: nj.general
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!wupost!darwin.sura.net!jvnc.net!princeton!att!cbnews!cbnewsl!noname
From: noname@cbnewsl.cb.att.com (  )
Subject: Re: NJ Aquarium ?
Organization: AT&T
Distribution: nj
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 1992 13:39:09 GMT
Message-ID: <1992Apr6.133909.21796@cbnewsl.cb.att.com>
References: <Apr.3.13.54.04.1992.15568@pilot.njin.net> <1992Apr3.221310.3625@porthos.cc.bellcore.com> <1992Apr4.004758.95620@drew.drew.edu>
Lines: 50