🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: nj.general
Article #396

Re: Most reliable radar detector

#396
From: Tchaka
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 00:00
45 lines
2580 bytes
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997 09:25:39 -0700, Steve <saxton@nospam.zippo.com>
was nearly thrown in Rikers for writing:

>Jason Dulnev wrote:

>> Have you ever driven on NJ Turnpike, portion of I-95? Average speed
>> there is well above 75 mph and almost any driver would tell you that
>> the safe speed on this good straight divided highway is far above
>> 55mph. It is also confirmed by governments of other states (like
>> Maryland) who raised speed limit on their portions of I-95 to 65mph.
>> But state of NJ artificially keeps the speed limit low to provide
>> steady stream of revenue even though they know that increasing speed
>> limit to 65 is most likely to reduce number of accidents (it would
>> certainly reduce number of accidents caused by drivers slamming on
>> their brakes when seeing a police car).
>> 
>> Jason Dulnev
>> dulnev@jhu.edu
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble,
>> competent people on a level with dentists, that would be splendid.
>>         John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946), British economist.
>> 
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>I find your evaluation of the NJ Turnpike difficult to believe. When
>I've travelled that highway the average speed was 60! And the NJ
>troopers will not hesitate to write a ticket for 8 mph over the
>posted limit.
>
>What's up?
>
>			Steve


Sorry Steve, but either you're talking about the Garden State Parkway
or you had a unique experience on the Turnpike.   I drove from NY to
DC last month and averaged between 75 and 80 and that was the norm.
Slowest people still held on near 70.  I used to live in Rahway, NJ
and even while going 85 I would occassionally be passed.  Even with
traffic, people average 70.  

T
Technical Details
Message-ID: <33b1ddf8.2436468@news.worldweb.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108b95,b91a9a87158f7dd1
X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public
X-Google-Thread: 101049,b91a9a87158f7dd1
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
X-Google-Thread: fa37c,b91a9a87158f7dd1
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa37c,public
From: tchaka@wrldweb.net (Tchaka)
Subject: Re: Most reliable radar detector
Date: 1997/06/26
Message-ID: <33b1ddf8.2436468@news.worldweb.net>
X-Deja-AN: 252599953
References: <5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com>
Organization: None
Newsgroups: nj.general,md.general,dc.general