Article View: nj.general
Article #396Re: Most reliable radar detector
From: Tchaka
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 00:00
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 1997 00:00
45 lines
2580 bytes
2580 bytes
On Wed, 25 Jun 1997 09:25:39 -0700, Steve <saxton@nospam.zippo.com> was nearly thrown in Rikers for writing: >Jason Dulnev wrote: >> Have you ever driven on NJ Turnpike, portion of I-95? Average speed >> there is well above 75 mph and almost any driver would tell you that >> the safe speed on this good straight divided highway is far above >> 55mph. It is also confirmed by governments of other states (like >> Maryland) who raised speed limit on their portions of I-95 to 65mph. >> But state of NJ artificially keeps the speed limit low to provide >> steady stream of revenue even though they know that increasing speed >> limit to 65 is most likely to reduce number of accidents (it would >> certainly reduce number of accidents caused by drivers slamming on >> their brakes when seeing a police car). >> >> Jason Dulnev >> dulnev@jhu.edu >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> If economists could manage to get themselves thought of as humble, >> competent people on a level with dentists, that would be splendid. >> John Maynard Keynes (1883-1946), British economist. >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > >I find your evaluation of the NJ Turnpike difficult to believe. When >I've travelled that highway the average speed was 60! And the NJ >troopers will not hesitate to write a ticket for 8 mph over the >posted limit. > >What's up? > > Steve Sorry Steve, but either you're talking about the Garden State Parkway or you had a unique experience on the Turnpike. I drove from NY to DC last month and averaged between 75 and 80 and that was the norm. Slowest people still held on near 70. I used to live in Rahway, NJ and even while going 85 I would occassionally be passed. Even with traffic, people average 70. T
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<33b1ddf8.2436468@news.worldweb.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108b95,b91a9a87158f7dd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,b91a9a87158f7dd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: fa37c,b91a9a87158f7dd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa37c,public From: tchaka@wrldweb.net (Tchaka) Subject: Re: Most reliable radar detector Date: 1997/06/26 Message-ID: <33b1ddf8.2436468@news.worldweb.net> X-Deja-AN: 252599953 References: <5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com> Organization: None Newsgroups: nj.general,md.general,dc.general