Article View: nj.general
Article #398Re: Most reliable radar detector
From: Chris Mauritz
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00
47 lines
3409 bytes
3409 bytes
In nj.general Steve <saxton@nospam.zippo.com> wrote: :P~Jason Dulnev wrote: :P~ :P~> I really didn't want to participate in this thread that keeps popping :P~> up in this newsgroup, but I simply cannot let this one go. You're :P~> saying that local government cannot force you to exceed speed limit. :P~> That's not true. It's very easy for a government to force you to :P~> speed. All they need to do for that is set speed limit that is way too :P~> low for a given road as judged by an average driver. If a government :P~> were to set a 35 mph speed limit on Interstate highways, would ANYONE :P~> follow these (and I'm only referring to mentally healthy individuals :P~> with at least a month of driving experience)? NO, no-one will. That's :P~> a cash cow right there and you can always find nut cases who would :P~> defend this speed limit. The situation is not that different with :P~> artificial 55mph speed limit enforced in most states. :P~> :P~> Have you ever driven on NJ Turnpike, portion of I-95? Average speed :P~> there is well above 75 mph and almost any driver would tell you that :P~> the safe speed on this good straight divided highway is far above :P~> 55mph. It is also confirmed by governments of other states (like :P~> Maryland) who raised speed limit on their portions of I-95 to 65mph. :P~> But state of NJ artificially keeps the speed limit low to provide :P~> steady stream of revenue even though they know that increasing speed :P~> limit to 65 is most likely to reduce number of accidents (it would :P~> certainly reduce number of accidents caused by drivers slamming on :P~> their brakes when seeing a police car). :P~I find your evaluation of the NJ Turnpike difficult to believe. When :P~I've travelled that highway the average speed was 60! And the NJ :P~troopers will not hesitate to write a ticket for 8 mph over the :P~posted limit. :P~What's up? Are you guys travelling the same turnpike I use to and from work every day? The average speed according to my reckoning (and the folks flashing lights at me to pass) is 70. I routinely blow by cops at 70 and have yet to get pulled over. And I'm not exactly in a low profile car...a 5.0 Mustang. :) Chris -- Christopher Mauritz | For info on internet access: Director, Internet Operations | finger/mail info@interactive.net OR IBS Interactive, Inc. | http://www.interactive.net/ ritz@interactive.net |
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<ECC96L.I55@news.interactive.net>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 108b95,b91a9a87158f7dd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,b91a9a87158f7dd1 X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public X-Google-Thread: fa37c,b91a9a87158f7dd1 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa37c,public From: Chris Mauritz <ritz@interactive.net> Subject: Re: Most reliable radar detector Date: 1997/06/25 Message-ID: <ECC96L.I55@news.interactive.net> X-Deja-AN: 252493700 X-Nntp-Posting-Host: newonyx.interactive.net References: <5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com> X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@interactive.net if this posting is inappropriate X-Trace: news.interactive.net 867253628 19051 ritz [208.192.224.60] Organization: IBS Interactive, Inc. Newsgroups: nj.general,md.general,dc.general