🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: nj.general
Article #398

Re: Most reliable radar detector

#398
From: Chris Mauritz
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 1997 00:00
47 lines
3409 bytes
In nj.general Steve <saxton@nospam.zippo.com> wrote:
:P~Jason Dulnev wrote:
:P~ 
:P~> I really didn't want to participate in this thread that keeps popping
:P~> up in this newsgroup, but I simply cannot let this one go. You're
:P~> saying that local government cannot force you to exceed speed limit.
:P~> That's not true. It's  very easy for a government to force you to
:P~> speed. All they need to do for that is set speed limit that is way too
:P~> low for a given road as judged by an average driver. If a government
:P~> were to set a 35 mph speed limit on Interstate highways, would ANYONE
:P~> follow these (and I'm only referring to mentally healthy individuals
:P~> with at least a month of driving experience)? NO, no-one will. That's
:P~> a cash cow right there and you can always find nut cases who would
:P~> defend this speed limit. The situation is not that different with
:P~> artificial  55mph speed limit enforced in most states.
:P~> 
:P~> Have you ever driven on NJ Turnpike, portion of I-95? Average speed
:P~> there is well above 75 mph and almost any driver would tell you that
:P~> the safe speed on this good straight divided highway is far above
:P~> 55mph. It is also confirmed by governments of other states (like
:P~> Maryland) who raised speed limit on their portions of I-95 to 65mph.
:P~> But state of NJ artificially keeps the speed limit low to provide
:P~> steady stream of revenue even though they know that increasing speed
:P~> limit to 65 is most likely to reduce number of accidents (it would
:P~> certainly reduce number of accidents caused by drivers slamming on
:P~> their brakes when seeing a police car).

:P~I find your evaluation of the NJ Turnpike difficult to believe. When
:P~I've travelled that highway the average speed was 60! And the NJ
:P~troopers will not hesitate to write a ticket for 8 mph over the
:P~posted limit.

:P~What's up?

Are you guys travelling the same turnpike I use to and from work
every day?  The average speed according to my reckoning (and the
folks flashing lights at me to pass) is 70.  I routinely blow
by cops at 70 and have yet to get pulled over.  And I'm not exactly
in a low profile car...a 5.0 Mustang.  :)

Chris
-- 
Christopher Mauritz           | For info on internet access:
Director, Internet Operations | finger/mail info@interactive.net OR
IBS Interactive, Inc.         | http://www.interactive.net/
ritz@interactive.net          | 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <ECC96L.I55@news.interactive.net>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail
References: <5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 108b95,b91a9a87158f7dd1
X-Google-Attributes: gid108b95,public
X-Google-Thread: 101049,b91a9a87158f7dd1
X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public
X-Google-Thread: fa37c,b91a9a87158f7dd1
X-Google-Attributes: gidfa37c,public
From: Chris Mauritz <ritz@interactive.net>
Subject: Re: Most reliable radar detector
Date: 1997/06/25
Message-ID: <ECC96L.I55@news.interactive.net>
X-Deja-AN: 252493700
X-Nntp-Posting-Host: newonyx.interactive.net
References: <5okckc$n57@news.cyberenet.net> <19970624052501.BAA26592@ladder01.news.aol.com> <5oohjr$inv@news.cyberenet.net> <33afe85f.250059@netnews.worldnet.att.net> <33B14683.A9B@nospam.zippo.com>
X-Complaints-To: Email abuse@interactive.net if this posting is inappropriate
X-Trace: news.interactive.net 867253628 19051 ritz [208.192.224.60]
Organization: IBS Interactive, Inc.
Newsgroups: nj.general,md.general,dc.general