🚀 go-pugleaf

Attn: Mr. Andrew Penn,
Chief Executive Officer,

Attn: Simon Fieldhouse
Group Complaint Co-ordinator

AXA Global (Australia) Group Insurance
Level 12, 447 Collins Street,
Melbourne, Victoria 3000

PO Box 4927 VV
Melbourne Victoria 8060

Thursday, 19 October 2006

1.	Thank-you for your letter dated 10 October 2006 [#57] received
today.

2.	You state in regard to "matters previously before the Victoria
Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and
Administrative Tribunal and the Financial Industry Complaints
Service," that "[I] made a number of references in [my] letter to
matters that, in the past, were before these bodies.  [AXA] understand
that the matters brought under the Equal Opportunity Act 1995 and
referred to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal were struck
out by the Tribunal in 2001.  [You] also note that [my] complaint
lodged with the Financial Industry Complaints Service in 2004 was
dismissed.  As these matters are now concluded, [AXA] regret that
[they] am unable to take those issues any further."

3.	I enclose correspondence to Rhonda O'Donnell, President Novell
Asia Pacific dated 30 September 2006 which summarizes the complaint
relating to: "...whether a provision under the contract has any
further effective force against the natural law and common law 'right
of humanity in his own person', with respect to the Insurer's
responsibility to advise of a provisions effect on 'total and
permanent disability' associated to 'exclusions' that were sought
in July 1995 through an initiating administrative request on
clarification of 'terms and conditions of employment' made to the
employer Novell Limited."

4.	Recent amendment to New South Wales double jeopardy laws, however
allows in circumstances where there is new evidence, which might
otherwise substantiate the claim, that I may again pursue the
consideration of the employer's view I was acting with duplicity (ie.
double-dipping by claiming both Superannuation and Income Continuance
benefits) as complaint made to the New South Wales Anti-Discrimination
Board in December 1995.  Which due to the need to undertake urgent
medial therapy, an uncertain and drastic prognosis, meant the matter
was quickly resolved in lieu of Novell Pty. Ltd. making a donation to
an AIDS charity.

5.	I steadfastly deny the Insurer's claimed interpretation as right
under the Salary Continuance Policy to establish HIV/AIDS as a binding
norm for the natural life of the contract against my autonomous right
as desire not to be subject to hymeneal religious values based
antagonism associated to a claim of compliance to Natural and Common
Law and Constitutional Rights and for which there are historical
precedents.

6.	That whilst it is noted within Reasons for Decisions dated 29 March
2001 in matter A500 of 2000 of Victorian Civil and Administrative
Tribunal, Civil Division, Anti-Discrimination List, that "the
[Insured] is not a lawyer, does not characterise his complaints in the
terms used in the Equal Opportunity Act. While this is not fatal to his
complaint, it has simply made the Tribunal's task a little more
difficult."

"[15] The Tribunal has borne in mind that [...] Mr Boek had no legal
representation in this proceeding. It has, at various directions
hearings, explained to him which of his claims still survived and what
particulars of his case he must supply. I do not think that Mr Boek
failed to understand this guidance. It seems however that he above all
wishes to continue to put forward the claims based on religious beliefs
or political activities." [para 15, Reasons for Decisions Boek v
Australian Casualty and Life, Capecchi [2002] VCAT 92 (12 February
2002)]

"[11] On 4 June 2001, the Tribunal directed Mr Boek to file and serve
particulars of the surviving claims. What Mr Boek filed and served was
a voluminous document in effect repeating his original claims include
those claims which the Tribunal had dismissed. The document did not set
out events in chronological order and was in many places unclear. Not
only did it include material concerning the dismissed claims but it
was, in my view, a document which was not in a form that would enable
the respondents to prepare particulars of defence.

[12] In July 2001, on 19 July to be exact, on 16 October 2001 and again
on 16 November 2001, the Tribunal made similar directions requiring
particulars of complaint. Each time Mr Boek filed and served material
which included the dismissed claims, it was not in chronological order
and was not in a form which would enable the respondents to prepare
particulars of defence." [Para 11-12, Reasons for Decision 12
February 2002]

"[16] I have said that I am satisfied that by conducting the
proceeding in this way, he unnecessarily disadvantaged the respondents
and that disadvantage lay in the persistent failure to particularise
the surviving claims only and the inclusion in particulars of the
dismissed claims. In my view there has also been on Mr Boek's part
conduct which has unreasonably prolonged the time taken to complete
this proceeding.

[17] Had Mr Boek particularised his claims as the Tribunal directed at
an early stage, subsequent directions hearings would have been avoided.
Alternatively had he withdrawn the surviving claims on the basis that
he no longer wished to pursue them and had done this at an earlier
stage, further directions hearings would have been unnecessary."
[para 16-17, Reasons for Decisions 12 February 2002]

7.	It was in the natural course of "comply[ing] with the Tribunal's
directions which were designed so that proper particulars of complaint
could be filed and served" [Reasons for Decisions 12 February 2002]
and in deference to the fact as noted by the Tribunal "the [Insured]
is not a lawyer" and "had no legal representation in this
proceeding", having received a Calderbank offer from legal counsel
for AXA acting on behalf of the Respondents: Australian Casualty and
Life Ltd and Mark Capecchi, made two telephone calls to the
Respondent's legal counsel on 30 November 2001.

8.	I would expect that in terms of making further considerations on
negotiating a settlement with the Respondent's under Section 112 to
115 of the VCAT Act 53/1998 or either to seek leave from the Tribunal
under Section 74(1) on the grounds that another court would be a more
appropriate forum and jurisdiction for the matter of 'religious and
political belief and activity' and a 'claim that the respondents by
alleged treatment had breached the Federal Constitution' [Reasons for
Decision, 12 February 2002] in accordance with Section 77(1) of this
same Act.  That a greater professional regard, ought to have been shown
by the legal counsel for AXA.

9.	While the Tribunal may under Section 73(3) "give leave at any time
for a person to intervene in a proceeding subject to any conditions the
Tribunal thinks fit." There is a requirement for the Respondents to
"file and serve particulars of the application for leave" and to
grant sufficient time for a response to be prepared, before the matter
of leave is considered.

10.	The Insurer submitted to the 7 December 2001 Tribunal Hearing, that
the earlier Directions Orders, which were in effect at the time, should
be short-circuited and the matter ought to be dealt with at that
instance.  Submitting that there ought to be procedural fairness
accorded to them.

11.	That legal counsel for AXA have "attempted to deceive the
Tribunal" and "vexatiously conducted the proceeding" which is
prohibited under Section 109(3)(v)(vi) by making unsustainable
allegations: "I am not sure that intention is entirely relevant.
[This: 3876 Ego: #69 - Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious; Super:
#69 - Profound Use/ Function of the Mysterious; Telos: #69; I-Ching:
H34 - Strength of Greatness; Mystery: #22 - Resistance]

It is the manner in which I reasonably interpreted those phone
messages.  [This: 4054 Ego: #4 - Using Guidance/ Sourceless; Super: #73
- Employing Deeming/ Daring to Act; Telos: #73; I-Ching: H46 - Moving
Upward; Mystery: #7 - Ascent]

Here is a transcript before the court. [This: 2065 Ego: #40 - Reversal/
Avoiding Activity; Super: #32 -Natural Guide/ Virtue of Holiness;
Telos: #113; I-Ching: H44 - Coming On; Mystery: #43 - Encounters]

I was threatened by Mr. Boek, who by his conduct today and in the past,
on any object view appears to be unstable, [This: 9114 Ego: #42 -
Generating Things/ Reason's Modifications; Super: #74 - Controlling
Feelings/ Overcome Delusion; Telos: #155; I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles;
Mystery: #80 - Labouring]

I think it inappropriate that this matter be continued." [This: 3130
Ego: #21 -Guiding and the Physical/ Emptying the Heart; Super: #14 -
Metaphysical Issues/ Praising the Mysterious; Telos: #176; I-Ching: H19
- Approaching; Mystery #9 - Branching Out]

12.	This conduct by the Insurer not only denied me "a reasonable
opportunity to be heard" as a consideration for which costs may be
awarded under Section 109(5), but that legal counsel for AXA's
"attempt to deceive the Tribunal" and "vexatiously conduct the
proceeding" was retaliation for my public protest and ecclesiastical
ritual as oath performed outside AXA's offices situated at 447
Collins Street, Melbourne on 4 July 2001 and a similar protest at a
police picnic in the Treasury Gardens on Sunday 28 October 2001.

INTENTION (THINK! 4th July, 2001)
To Battle -- Cry Out (Sha'al)
Near Battle -- Direction (Yadah) as MEANS (to carry out the intention)
>From Battle -- Honor (Shachah) as CONSEQUENCE (after performing the
means)

Dear Prime Minister,

Today, between 0830 - 0900 hours in the forecourt of AXA Australia's
447 Collins Street offices, Melbourne, wearing a Rainbow Sash, I
recited publicly the following 11 line prayer. Shortly before 0900 am I
was approached by a TMG Motorcycle policeman, Constable Mark Rose Regn:
30033. I had a brief conversation with him, handed him the contents of
the page below [sans interpretation], shook his hand, thanked him and
continued my prayer.

He was concerned that I might have strayed too close to the entrance of
the building.

1 - Thinking superannuation? [This: 1639 Ego: #19 - Argument for
Ethical Anarchism/ Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching : H57 - Gentle
Penetration; Mystery : #58 - Closing In; Super: #19 Telos: #19]
2 - Thinking income protection? [This: 1267 Ego: #52 - So What?/
Returning to the Origin; I-Ching : H45 - Congregation; Mystery : #61 -
Embellishment; Super: #71 - Know-How as a Disease/ Disease of
Knowledge; I-Ching : H38 - Opposition; Mystery : #6 - Contrariety;
Telos: #71]
3 - Thinking peace of mind? [This: 606 Ego: #39 - Achieving Oneness/
Root of Order; I-Ching : H28 - Excess; Mystery : #76 - Aggravation;
Super: #29 - Deeming/ Non-Assertion; I-Ching : H36 - Sinking Light;
Mystery : #67 - Darkening; Telos: #110]
4 - You wont know what institutional abuse is until you've experienced
AXA. [This: 8446 Ego: #22 - Point to Reversal?/ Humility's Increase;
I-Ching : H8 - Seeking Unity; Mystery : #34 - Kinship; Super: #51 -
Natural Guides and Natural Virtuosity/ Nursing Virtue; I-Ching : H47 -
Exhaustion; Mystery : #69 - Exhaustion; Telos: #132]
5 - Think again! [This: 355 Ego: #31 - Military Strategies as Guides/
Quelling War; I-Ching : H32 - Endurance; Mystery : #51 - Constancy;
Super: #1 - To Guide with Names/ Reason's Realisation; I-Ching : H58 -
Joy; Mystery : #24 - Joy; Telos: #163]
6 - Lest you forget what FASCISM is. [This: 2840 Ego: #5 - Natural
Guidance/ Function of Emptiness; I-Ching : H63 - Completion & After;
Mystery : #73 - Completion; Super: #6 - Superiority of the Female/
Completion of Form; I-Ching : H25 - Innocence; Mystery : #66 -
Departure; Telos: #168]
7- And think you have a soul. [This: 2307 Ego: #39 - Achieving Oneness/
Root of Order; I-Ching : H28 - Excess; Mystery : #76 - Aggravation; ;
Super: #45 - Extremes and Reversals/ Greatest Virtue; I-Ching : H49 -
Revolution; Mystery : #28 - Change; Telos: #207]
8 - For their oppression, perversion of justice, & violation of
constitutional rights [This: 5225 Ego: #41 - Playing with Reversal/
Sameness in Difference; I-Ching : H26 - Restraining Force; Mystery :
#60 - Accumulation; Super: #5 - Natural Guidance/ Function of
Emptiness; I-Ching : H63 - Completion & After; Mystery : #73 -
Completion; Telos: #248]
9 - May their names be taken [This: 1532 Ego: #74 - Controlling
Feelings/ Overcome Delusion; I-Ching : H39 - Obstacles; Mystery : #80 -
Labouring; Super: #79 - Recognizing Agreements/ Keep Your Obligations;
I-Ching : H56 - Wanderer; Mystery : #31 - Packing; Telos: #322]
10 - From the Book of Life. [This: 667 Ego: #19 - Argument for Ethical
Anarchism/ Returning to Simplicity; ; I-Ching : H57 - Gentle
Penetration; Mystery : #58 - Closing In; Super: #17 - Politics; I-Ching
: H54 - Marriageable Maiden; Mystery : #65 - Inner; Telos: #341]
11- Hear my prayer in this Sabbath Millenium year oh Lord. Amen. [This:
4147 Ego: #16 - Being a Guide/ Returning to the Root; I-Ching : H28 -
Excess; Mystery : #75 - Failure; Super: #33 - Achievable Goals/ Virtue
of Discrimination; I-Ching : H9 - Minor Restraint; Mystery : #35 -
Gathering; Telos: #357]

13.	This public prayer sworn by oath before police on 4 July 2001 and
28 October 2001 relates to my objective and subjective knowledge of the
absolute unity of God as the Infinite being and the cause of all
things, being grounded in time by which we may observe the
phenomenology of spirit--from its inception pre-September 11, 2001
implemented a certain encoding as decal theme deployed in retort that
were obtained from names as historical instances of this spiritual
phenomena associated to the Christian notion circa (33 CE) of "#73 -
Employing Deeming/Daring to Act (moving upward/ascent)" [Acts 6:1-7]
and circa (72J + 3(3^2+1)/2 = 457 BCE) as #9 - Inconstancy of
Achievement/ Practising Placidity (army, legion). [Esther 1:10, 13-15]
I acknowledge that I had specifically developed this neural linguistic
paradigm, as encyclical architecture as response to religious derived
terrorism.

14.	As detailed in paragraphs 27, 33 to 35 of my 16 June 2004 complaint
to the Financial Industry Complaints Service:

	"[27] Furthermore, it was out of concern for giving a complete
justification for my day-to-day activities and intellectual and
esoteric pursuit as philological investigation and development of a
supernal number based and rational model, which I showed Dr. Baker as a
particular subject matter addressed by a book. As a treatise on Reason,
the book articulates two treatises of an alternate understanding of the
Pythagorean cosmology given as 'Theory of Number' and 'From One
to Ten - A Treatise on the origin and extension of the prime
manifestation on the physical plane.'

	...

	[33] My life had become solitary and quietly reflective within an
environment purpose built to sustain retirement.  I occupy my time in
spiritual contemplation and engaging in spiritual discussion groups.  I
showed him [this aforementioned] book on the subject of the
Philosopher's Stone {ie. the quadruple form 9(92+1)/2 = #369 as
vMeme/Moment matrix}-an imaginary substance or preparation believed
capable of transmuting baser metals into gold or silver, and of
prolonging life.  Having accepted the fatality of my life circumstance,
this is the only matter to which my mind attends as my field of
enriching interest in retirement.

	[34] Dr. Baker asked if I did any public presentations or speaking
engagements on this topic of interest.  I informed him that I confined
my involvement to Internet discussion groups, from which I maintain
chapter characterizations of the discourses on my homepage-Such
characterizations, the Insurer has subsequently complained are
voluminous and as grounds for dismissal of my complaint before the
Tribunal. There is a public newsgroup record of my now 9 years of
Internet activity as religious based newsgroup discourses, together
with the accompanying treatise relating to the quadruple #369
vMeme/Moment Matrix further substantiates my claim.

	[35] This model is documented on my WWW-page as my e-mail
participation in the development, articulation and conveyance of a
mathematical, chronological, psychological, autonomous, isonomic and
taxonomical model {vMeme/Moment Cube Matrix} which was devised from
many years of philological research, as a transcendental means to
investigate, document, tranquilize and negate religiously derived
terrorism."

- <http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/images/hyponomia.gif>
- <http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/images/sept112001.gif>
- <http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/images/nous.gif>

15.	Consequently, the Insurer was advised by Registered Post letter
dated 22 September 2006, of my intention to proceed with a civil claim
of discrimination made against AXA Insurance, and its individual
employees as allegedly profane and immoral persons: Mark Capecchi,
Peter Riddell, Katharina (no surname given) and Les Owen the former
Chief Executive Officer on the grounds of 'impairment',
'religious activity or belief' and 'political belief or
activity' in the area of provision of goods and services originally
made under the Equal Opportunity Act 1995 which will be substantiated
on the grounds that the violation of Natural and Common Law and
Australian Constitutional Rights amounts to persecution of the 'right
of humanity in his own person' and a remedy sought against these
individual's citizenship and right to procreate within the
Commonwealth.

16.	The Insurer has again failed to give consideration to my
requirement expressed by paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and
paragraphs 21 to 26 of my 22 September 2006 correspondences, that
"any further written and signed requests for medical attendances from
the Insurer ought to grant sufficient time for an administrative
requirement to be undertaken and is contingent upon attendance at any
Independent Medical Examination."

17.	This administrative requirement, is required to be undertaken prior
to any medical consultation as consideration of whether, in their
representation of the Insurer, there is any serious willful
indifference or serious willful misconduct on behalf of a Medical
Practitioner (ie. intentional reckless behavior) that may be judged by
a standard of a body of knowledge including the custom and practice of
doctors facing similar situations in equivalent or approximate
circumstances with patients experiencing similar problems-This
requirement would appear to be particularly meritorious given news
reporting of a 9 October 2006 stabbing of a teenage girl by her father
a medical doctor grieved that his daughter was converting from Islam to
Christianity: "Gold Coast Muslims lashed out against claims the
murder was a Koran-sanctioned ritual killing to punish the rejection of
Islam.  There is [supposedly] no ritual killing in Islam." [The
Australian, 12 October 2006, p 5]

18.	This requirement is consistent with my objection to the Insurer's
right to establish HIV/AIDS as a binding norm for the natural life of
the contract against my autonomous right as desire not to be subject
due to historical precedents relating to hymeneal religious values
based antagonism associated to claimed compliance to Natural Law:
·	Concordat Between the Holy See & the German Reich on 20 July 1933
as [#10, #59, #7, #78 * Recognizing Fidelity/ Trust in Faith, #57 -
Laissez Faire Politics/ Simplicity In Habits, #77, #80, #26, #47]

·	Melbourne Saint Patrick's Cathedral - Public Ritualised Religious
Persecution on Pentecost Sunday 11 June 2000 as [#17 * Politics, #30,
#39, #8 - The Worth of Water/ Easy By Nature, #7 - Intentional
Reversal/ Dimming Radiance, #70, #9, #25, #40]

·	The 'invention and carry out of political Constitutions
independently of religion' is in point of fact shown to be a complete
fallacy by the historical reality of the Church of England Act No.
45/1854.  Which was an Act enabling the Bishops, Clergy and Laity of
the United Church of England and Ireland in Victoria to provide for the
regulation of the affairs of the said Church.

·	There has been a campaign of lobbying and propagandizing respective
members of parliament, to ensure that Institutional Religious agendas
as claims to Marriage {ie. Hymenealism deifies this principle} as a
binding norm for piety and seemingly the protection of the Biblical
definition of monogamous gamogenesis {ie. marriage + genesis as
'origin / creation' as procreation:"marriage means the union of a
man and a woman to the exclusion of all others, voluntarily entered
into for life."} were adequately represented within our legislation
and despite these historical precedents.

·	An axiomatic or insubstantial 'State' based hymeneal values,
which on the basis of dichotomy of opposites, continues to proffer a
lack of accountability as the split between religion/faith, politics
and real life-a denial of our autonomous, sovereign, natural law,
common law and Australian Constitutional rights through making an
appeal to section 75(2)(b) of the Equal Opportunity Act 1995 which
'allows the Church to discriminate against a person where it is
necessary to avoid injury to the religious sensitivities of the people
of the religion'.

·	A continual practice of societal exclusion perpetuated by
Australians' professing religious values and the engaging in of an
Internet based 'cause celebre' as the continuous process of
staining a person's reputation and essential being on newsgroups as 'a
cause of reproach; blemish', that might in the circumstances be
considered an infringement of Section 8 of Victoria's (Australia)
Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001 Act No. 47/200

·	The GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC PARADIGM represents religious belief
concerning God's manifestation in nature and in human languages and
numerical systems as a unified system proposes political action by the
emendation of invalidated Letters Patent. The exclusion of individuals
with same gender aspirations from religious married life is a violation
of the autonomous, sovereignty as natural, common law and
constitutional right.
19.	The consideration on whether a provision under the contract has any
further effective force against the natural law, common law and
constitutional 'right of humanity in his own person' suggests
invalidating the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901
[#51, #66, #77, #37 - Non-Deeming Action/ Administration of Government,
#31 - Military Strategies as Guides/ Quelling War, #62, #40, #57, #21]
through proposing a framework of governance [#43, #43, #9, #30 -
Government without Coercion/ Be Chary of War, #30, #34, #3, #2, #59],
which draws its impetus from the principles of individual
accountability expressed by 'obedience, aiding and assisting to the
Governor General' and the notion of 'Administration of
Government' conveyed by Paragraph 8 of the Letters Patent to the
Australian Constitution.
20.	The decision to undertake such an administrative requirement also
derives its impetus in part from my ANZAC day (25 April 2006) arrest in
Avon Street, Briagolong, and my subsequent conveyance and detention at
the Briagolong Police Station following a concerted and conniving
effort to have me removed from the street, made by a Queensland based
Internet aus.religion.christian forum participant from the Egyptian
Coptic community and local residents--which had a distinct flavor of
religious intolerance:
	"If not in [th]is the fruit of his heretical Sabbatarian and
Judaistic mixed non-Christian beliefs mixed with his physical
ailments." [Athanasius 0730 hrs 1 May 2006]

	"Briagolong Police have been informed both of your postings on this
group referring to the Assistant Police Commissioner (Vic) and your
intentions for tomorrow's Anzac Day March protest in Briagolong."
[Athanasius 1526 hrs 24 April 2006]

21.	This would appear to be particularly relevant given Paragraphs 39
to 41 of VCAT Reasons for Decision dated 29 March 2001 that conveys
with respect to 'political or religious belief activity', a view of
"the religious belief on which Mr Boek relies, and his religious
activities, are that he is a Seventh-day Adventist and he has a belief,
and has supported that by substantial writing in the area, in God's
manifestation in nature and in human languages and numerical systems as
a unified system."

22.	That the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission had
on 26 April 2001, acted unconscionably against the Natural Law and
Common Law consideration of "the right of humanity in their own
person", to hold a rational and reasoned religious/political belief as
objective and subjective knowledge of the absolute unity of God as the
Infinite being and the cause of all things, without fear, threat or
coercion.  By dismissing a contemporaneous compliant concerning 'a
refusal of membership renewal' citing grounds that the "Church has
submitted that your position on homosexuality will divert members from
the purpose and goal of the church" and a 26 April 2006 letter from the
General Secretary, Seventh-day Adventist Church (Victorian Conference)
Limited, confirming the earlier edict: "Like all citizens and
churches, the Seventh-day Adventist Church is bound by the laws of
Victoria and Australia, which include the Equal Opportunity Act 1995.
The church has no further comment to make on the matter of your earlier
complaint to the Equal Opportunity Commission of Victoria, other than
to note that the complaint was dismissed. The church will defend any
legal proceedings brought against it in relation to these matters."

23.	Seventh-day Adventist church leaders in Germany and Austria had,
according to Adventist Review reporting of 21 September 2005, noting
the sixtieth anniversary of the end of World War II, released a
declaration saying they "deeply regret" any participation in or support
of Nazi activities during the war--as the subscribing by ecclesiastical
oath "Before God and on the Holy Gospels I swear and promise to honor
and endeavour to avoid all detrimental acts which might endanger it" to
the hymeneal values proscribing marriage and sexual conduct for
citizens as ideology promulgated by the German Reich: "For those who
believe in God's love for every member of the human family, against any
kind of discrimination based on race, religion, or gender, this
declaration written by a generation which had no responsibility in the
Holocaust and the war, but endorse the responsibility of their parents,
will stand as a positive landmark and great encouragement." [John Graz,
Public Affairs and Religious Liberty director for the Adventist world
headquarters, Adventist Review 21 September 2005]

24.	With the August 2004 passage of the Marriage Legislation Amendment
Bill as an Act to amend the Commonwealth Marriage Act 1961 and Family
Law Act 1975, with a formal monogamous definition of gamogenesis as:
"marriage means the union of a man and a woman to the exclusion of
all others, voluntarily entered into for life." It is now essential
to seek clarification from Independent Medical Examiners as to how
their individual or organizational views of Marriage is differentiated
from the Natural Law claim articulated by the 4 Nuremberg Laws
introduced from 15 September 1935 as the basis for Natural Law's rule
of conduct against the Natural law and Common Law sovereign and
autonomous right of the Jews--And similarly of homosexuality, which was
politically viewed as not only detrimental to natural population
growth, but harmful to the nation's strength and family life, being
denounced by a Political Party Purge in 30 June 1934.

25.	As a consideration of a complaint has previously been made to the
Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission on 26 April 2001,
in relation to "the right of humanity in their own person", to hold a
rational and reasoned religious/political belief as objective and
subjective knowledge of the absolute unity of God as the Infinite being
and the cause of all things, without fear, threat or coercion, it is
appropriate to further advise of 'victimization' provisions as
prohibitions on other conduct and vicarious liability for
discrimination specified by Section 96 and 97 of the Victorian Equal
Opportunity Act No 42/1995.

26.	Accordingly Section 96 and 97 of the Victorian Equal Opportunity
Act No 42/1995 might be said to apply as prohibitions on other conduct
and vicarious liability for discrimination as victimization:

	"96. Prohibition of victimization: A person must not victimize
another person.

	97. What is Victimisation?: (1) A person victimizes another person if
the person subjects or threatens to subject the other person to any
detriment because the other person, or a person associated with the
other person-

(a)	has made a complaint against any person;
(b)	has brought any other proceedings under this Act against any
person;
(f)	has alleged that any person has contravened a provision of Part 3,
5, or 6, unless the allegation is false and was not made in good faith;

or because the person believes that the other person or the associate
has done or intends to do any of those things.

(2)	It is sufficient for sub-section (1)(f) that the allegation states
the act or omission that would constitute the contravention without
actually stating that this Act, or a provision of this Act, has been
contravened.
(3)	In determining whether a person victimizes another person it is
irrelevant-


(a)	whether or not a factor in sub-section (1) is the only or dominant
reason for the treatment or threaten treatment as long as it is a
substantial reason;

(b)	whether the person acts alone or in association with any other
person."

27.	 I note that Insurer advises "reasonable traveling expenses to
attend the appointment will be pre-paid, as per [my] request.  However,
if you do not attend the appointment, that payment would need to be
refunded to AXA." As advised in paragraphs 36 to 39 of my 22
September 2006 letter, travel from my nominated Regional hub rather
than your specified travel designation points are preferred.

28.	Should the Medical Practitioner nominated by the Insurer fail to
adequately respond to the questions posed as part of the administrative
process, and undertaken prior to and conditional of my attendance at
any medical examination, then any monetary benevolence, sufficient to
meet those travel costs will be forfeited.

29.	I note that the Insurer advises, that a "failure to provide the
completed progress claim form and attend for medical examination is a
breach of the terms and conditions of your policy which could lead to
further action being taken by AXA.  Although no action will be taken at
present, I would request that you have the progress claim form
completed and returned to the claims assessor within the next
twenty-one days.  In addition, a further medical examination will be
arranged for you to attend and I would request that you attend that
appointment when it is made.  I will ask the assessor to provided you
with one months notice of such an appointment."

30.	Again I refer to paragraphs 75 to 78 of 29 May 2006 and paragraphs
17 to 18 of 22 September 2006, that in relocating to the simpler and
less frenetic environment of country life I have accepted the
recommendation of my medical specialists to undertake a regime of
bi-annual specialist consultations and subject to their availability,
the allocation of pharmaceutical requirements requisitioned in
accordance with the relevant legislative schedule as a means of
reducing costs.

31.	That the requirement to complete progress claims form within 21
days is not an authority for the Insurer to interfere, intervene, place
under duress or otherwise disrupt a regime of proposed Management Plan
recommendations and goals established and agreed to with my Medical
Specialist-As they are required to certify this claim form, its
completion will proceed according to the previously conveyed bi-annual
attendances regime.

32.	Whilst I appreciate that AXA has 'apologise[d] if our management
of the Claim has caused any distress to [me], as this was
unintentioned,' the claim is that as a homosexual I am being denied
my Natural, Common Law and Constitutional Rights and that Novell Asia
Pacific and the Insurer's lack of responsiveness is that they conduct
themselves in a manner equivalent to fascism within Australian society
which denies fair policing and access to timely and something other
than blind justice.

33.	Novell Asia Pacific has disregarded my administrative requirement
with regards to providing a letter noting the Employer and the
Insurer's responsibility under with Section 37 - 'Notification of
Unusual Terms' of the Insurance Contracts Act 1984, to have properly
advised of an Insurance provision's effect on 'total and permanent
disability' associated to 'exclusions' on HIV/AIDS.

34.	Accordingly, clarification is sought from the Insurer on the usage
of 'Unusual Terms' such as 'HIV' and 'AIDS' within the
contract, and whether the Insurer's usage of these terms conforms
with the common understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their
present-day usage-That no further consideration can be given to the
Insurer's administrative needs, until after this requirement is
satisfied.

Yours sincerely,


- dolf
- <http://www.sybilline.bigpondhosting.com/>