Article View: ny.general
Article #571Re: The art of declaring a lousy failure to be a smashing success
From: Cydrome Leader
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:26
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:26
58 lines
4273 bytes
4273 bytes
In chi.general Fabrikant <benny_patrick7@hotmail.com> wrote: Your posts are the longest most boring garbage I've ever come across on usenet. > I have never seen a human being honestly saying that he was incompetent > and failed. Usually, this person claims to be "not perfect", thus > creating impression that he is very good, just a little bit short of > perfection. Here are some other examples. > > Several years ago, a pilot ignored gauges telling him that something > was wrong with fuel supply to the left motor. He failed to notice that > his left wing was leaking fuel into the ocean. Instead of shutting up > his left motor, he switched the pump and started pumping fuel from > right wing to the left motor, thus speeding up loss of fuel. Soon he > had no fuel at all. Then he managed to land on the island and was > hailed as a hero, who saved the lives of his passengers. In reality, he > was the one, whose incompetence placed the passengers lives in danger > in the first place. Of course, the defective plane should not have > been allowed to fly. > > Just recently, Air France pilot has overshot the runway, skidded into a > ravine and caught fire. If you think, this is a lousy failure, think > again. The crew was hailed as heroes for saving life of passengers. > In reality, the pilot was the one, who endangered their lives in the > first place. If the weather was too bad, go to Montreal and land > there. In addition, we learned that out of 8 exits, 4 did not open; > out of the 4 open exits, 2 had slides not working. > > NASA spent over a $1 BILLION to fix the problem of foam chunks falling > from the fuel tank during launch. During the last launch, a chunk of > foam still fell off the tank, NASA has grounded all future shuttle > flights. Do you think, they would honestly say: "The last events > proved us to be totally incompetent"? On the contrary, the art of > declaring any failure to be a success was switched in full gear. > > I heard NASA representative saying proudly that NASA people are doing > IMPOSSIBLE tasks every day. It is sad that the reporter did not have > guts to tell this representative: "Fixing foam does not fall into the > category of things 'impossible', it does not even fall into the > category of 'difficult'. It seems like $1 million is too much to fix > it. You wasted $1 BILLION and still did not fix it. Should not your > top people apologize and resign in disgrace?" > > When astronauts arrived at the space station, they discovered that some > filling was sticking out between tiles. Again, instead of admitting > that someone did not do his job of fixing the filling, NASA declared > the event to be a smashing success: first in the world repairs to the > shuttle. > > During the past twenty years, NASA had 14 people killed in totally > preventable accidents. During the same time, Russians had not killed > anyone. Here is a suggestion: for the $1 BILLION wasted, NASA could > have hired Russians to transport its crews fourth and back at least 10 > times. > > Fabrikant >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<denfro$ftn$1@reader2.panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!not-for-mailReferences:
<1125062995.416507.146420@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,ca33155bdaf5af6c
X-Google-Thread: 101049,ca33155bdaf5af6c
X-Google-Thread: 10e835,ca33155bdaf5af6c
X-Google-Thread: 10d4c6,ca33155bdaf5af6c
X-Google-Thread: 10643c,ca33155bdaf5af6c
X-Google-Attributes: gid10a12a,gid101049,gid10e835,gid10d4c6,gid10643c,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!newsfeed2.dallas1.level3.net!news.level3.com!panix!not-for-mail
From: Cydrome Leader <presence@MUNGEpanix.com>
Newsgroups: ny.general,dc.general,chi.general,us.politics,tor.general
Subject: Re: The art of declaring a lousy failure to be a smashing success
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:26:32 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines: 58
Message-ID: <denfro$ftn$1@reader2.panix.com>
References: <1125062995.416507.146420@g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: panix2.panix.com
X-Trace: reader2.panix.com 1125073592 16311 166.84.1.2 (26 Aug 2005 16:26:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:26:32 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (NetBSD/2.0 (i386))