🚀 go-pugleaf

It has been day in and day out Coulter on every network insulting wives
of people, who perished in World Trade Centre. She reproached to them
being "millionaires," called them "broads" and "harpies," even saying
that they "enjoyed" death of their husbands and suggesting that their
husbands definitely wanted to divorce them. A normal person would never
buy a book of such a woman. Her book is selling number one and this
shows just how morally low Americans are.

The reporters interviewing her looked quite pathetic. Was this because
they were dumb or they did not want to ask proper questions? Here is
how I would have conducted the interview.

1. Would it be OK to say that Elie Wiesel enjoyed death of his parents
and his sister so much? Is it OK to reproach to him over a million he
got in Nobel Prize?

2. Many Jews received reparations from Germany; is it OK to say that
they enjoyed being in concentration camps and having their relatives
killed?

3. Is it OK to say that J. Walsh has enjoyed murder of his son, because
he made millions on his notoriety and hosting "America Most Wanted"?

4. Ms. Coulter, you claim that relatives of victims use their notoriety
to betray America and you can not even respond to them. You wrote a
whole book, should not it be considered as response? If yes, then did
you lie about your inability to respond?

5. Do you understand the difference between responding to betrayal of
America and response like "You are a harpy, your mother was a
prostitute and your father was a pimp"? Did you choose the second kind
of "response", because you have nothing convincing to say about the
betrayal?

6. If somebody calls Bush a murderer, do you have something to object,
except calling that person a scoundrel? Can a scoundrel still tell the
truth about Bush?

Fabrikant