🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

5 total messages Started by Fabrikant Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:14
Heroic escape?
#520
Author: Fabrikant
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 15:14
34 lines
3284 bytes
Each year in May and November we hear all the stories about Allies,
whose heroic entry in the World War II changed the course of war and
led to the victory.  Nothing is true in this propaganda: in June of
1944, Hitler was kicked out of the USSR and part of Eastern Europe, he
was essentially defeated.  Allies entered the war for the sole purpose
not to allow Stalin grab all of Europe and to share the spoils of war.
They did the same in WWI by entering the war one year before its end.

There was little heroic in the way Allies fought Hitler: they got stuck
in Ardennes and begged Stalin to start his attack earlier than he
planned in order to attract part of German army from Ardennes to him.
Stalin was happy to oblige.  During the time Soviet army liberated
Poland, Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria and Albania and conquered most of
Germany, Berlin included, Allies still have not managed to liberate all
major cities of Holland by the war end.  The Dutch are still grateful,
but this is just an indication of their nicety; which has nothing to do
with -the facts.

Then there was yet another fiasco with airborne attack near Arnhem in
the Netherlands: dumb Montgomery sent British solders to a sure death.
I saw recently a show entitled "Heroic Escape" about British, who stuck
near Arnhem and managed to escape back to their Army.  They did it by
hiding in Dutch families, who helped them endangering their own lives
and taking the food out of mouth of their children, while the whole
Holland was starving.  They were hiding, month after month, and shy
Dutch people did not have the courage to tell these parasites to recall
that they were soldiers and that their duty was to fight enemy and to
die if necessary, rather than be hiding among civilians.

There is nothing heroic in a soldier running away from the enemy.  Let
us call a spade a spade: "heroic" soldier running away from the enemy
is called coward.

Fabrikant
Re: Heroic escape?
#521
Author: Billy
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 17:40
7 lines
1568 bytes
Niet!

Only chalking the days on your cell's wall until the end...

No heroic escape for you!!!

(((((( HA HA HA )))
Re: Heroic escape?
#517
Author: Defender of Enormous Manhood
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 22:42
12 lines
2021 bytes
Actually that's Nyet, Nyet Soviet!

"Billy" <AmirHamadi@aol.com> wrote in message 
news:1134409230.129401.307750@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Niet!
>
> Only chalking the days on your cell's wall until the end...
>
> No heroic escape for you!!!
>
> (((((( HA HA HA )))
> 
Re: Heroic escape?
#518
Author: Terry
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 07:53
12 lines
1816 bytes
<benny_patrick7@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1134400446.495581.283000@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Each year in May and November we hear all the stories about Allies,
> whose heroic entry in the World War II changed the course of war and
> led to the victory ................................ snipped 
> ..........................
.
Another pathetic attempt to rewrite WWII history from a particular 
angle/point of view!
Not worth further comment; better historians abound; including some who were 
actually there! 
Re: Heroic escape?
#519
Author: Nexus7
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:09
5 lines
1586 bytes
Fabrikant wrote:
> There is nothing heroic in a soldier running away from the enemy.  Let

But there's something very presidential about it.
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads