🚀 go-pugleaf

>
>
> On 9/16/05 2:45 AM, in article
> pKuWe.2297$Op3.2154@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net, "Kurtz" <the
horror@HG.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Think about the implications of this: Nat'l Guard in Iraq, NorthCom
HERE.
> >
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=1
> > 04x4790112#4790272
> >
> > This is EXTREMELY important - we must understand NorthCom, one of the
> > official missions of which is to administer martial law when it is
declared.
> > And it can be declared by the President for "civil unrest."
> >
> > By the way, this is why I believe one of the goals of the policies of
the
> > Administration in this disaster was to CREATE enough "civil unrest" in
> > protest for their blatantly racist, murderous policies that it could be
> > hyped and fabricated into an excuse for widespread martial law - for our
own
> > "protection." The more "lootersT" and scary, endlessly shown TV clips of
> > angry faces, preferably dark faces, and the more likely enough people
would
> > be frightened to accept this step.
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.thenewamerican.com/artman/publish/article_18...
> >
> > The Bush Administration's "Enabling Act"
> >
> > January 24, 2005 Issue
> >
> > {Italicized in the original} In early December, without a word of public
> > notice, the Justice Department placed on its website a lengthy September
25,
> > 2001 memorandum entitled "The President's Constitutional Authority to
> > Conduct Military Operations Against Terrorists and Nations Supporting
Them."
> > That document sets out, on behalf of the Bush administration, a plainly
> > totalitarian view of presidential power.
> >
> > (snip)
> >
> > Reviewing the specific text of the Constitution, the Yoo memo makes the
> > interesting discovery that "these provisions vest full control of the
> > military forces of the United States in the President." In fact,
Congress,
> > not the president, is authorized "To raise and support armies . To
provide
> > and maintain a navy . provide for calling forth the militia...." It is
> > Congress, not the president, that is given the power "To make rules for
the
> > government and regulation of the land and naval forces...." Those
elements
> > of the militia that are "employed in the service of the United States"
are
> > to be trained "according to the discipline prescribed by Congress."
> >
> > The Yoo memo's treatment of congressional power to declare war is
similarly
> > dishonest. "During the period leading up to the Constitution's
ratification,
> > the power to initiate hostilities and to control the escalation of
conflict
> > had long been understood to rest in the hands of the executive branch,"
> > claims the document. This is true only in the sense that the King of
Great
> > Britain - that government's chief executive - claimed and exercised that
> > power.
> >
> >
> > Call, fax, EMail, or write your representatives TODAY! Tommorrow may be
too
> > late!

"George Kerby" <ghost_topper@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:BF50322A.28896%ghost_topper@hotmail.com...
> If this isn't the infamous cut n' paste 'Cobra', it's his clone:

So why don't you mount a spirited C'n'P defense?


Or, why can't you post your views on a bankrupt nation flirting with Martial
Law?