🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:03:01 -0700, wrcowan1@hal-pc.org wrote:

>
>
>Chris wrote:
>> <wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
>> news:43265b69$0$10624$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
>> 
>>>>
>>>>So when those images get to the OPs center...what do they do with them?
>>>>Surely they wouldn't send the information to the troops on the ground
>> 
>> now
>> 
>>>>would they...I mean just because that is waht the equipment is designed
>> 
>> for
>> 
>>>>doesn't mean they have to use it that way does it. Sorry, but the
>> 
>> clueless
>> 
>>>>one in this argument is you if you think they don't have the capability
>> 
>> to
>> 
>>>>get realtime images on the ground, hell even ones an hour or two old
>> 
>> would
>> 
>>>>suffice....but don't let logic get in your way.
>>>
>>>
>>>No, I am aware of how satelitie images are gathered, used and
>>>interpreted.  I use them all the time.  First satelite resources have to
>>>be moved into place.  Then the information gathered.  It does not get
>>>instantly analyized nor does it get directly into the field.  Even if
>>>satelite information is available it still may not tell you if a road is
>>>passable (debris or obstacles) or even how high the water is.  I know we
>>>can get real time images in to the field but we do not have people in
>>>field who have the skills to do interpretation that you are suggesting
>>>to be done.  It is one thing to get images showing armor, vehiclesand
>>>emplacements but it is another to use it to tell you water depths or
>>>hidden obstacles.
>>>
>>>MRC
>> 
>> 
>> So you are still saying that if you can see a car up to it's wheels in water
>> that you can't tell how deep it is? Maybe you need to learn what the
>> capabilities really are.
>
>
>I see you have been watching too many movies.  I suggest you study a 
>little bit about aerial photgraphic interpretation and remote sensing. 
>Also you act as if there is a car hub cap at every intersection.
>
>I am fully aware of the capabilities of the resource available as well 
>as limitations.  The men on the ground do not get 6in, or 1 ft 
>resolution images.  Many times it is 1m or 3 m resolution images.
>
>MRC

And, of course, with their "x-ray" vision, they can tell if the road
is washed out 2 feet in front of the semi-submerged car wheels...

Liberals... No analytical abilities... Whatareyagonnado?

Mike Smith