🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 01:00:35 GMT, Wooly <nobody@nun.ya>
wrote:

>On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:17:20 GMT, "Kurtz" <the horror@HG.com> spewed
>forth :
>
>> This is a really disgusting example of Compa$$ionate Con$ervative$
>>CleaningUP!
>>
>>'About 7 a.m., the group was addressed by one of the drill sergeant-like
>>foremen, who said they were to march in a file to the work site, which
>>turned out to be the $800-million Beau Rivage casino,
>
>What part of "integral to the local economy" don't you understand?
>The casinos employ thousands of people and bring billions of dollars
>to the Miss'ippi Gulf coast.  I guess by your logic getting people
>back to work isn't a priority...

  I guess by your "logic", companies earning billions
of dollars are unable to pay for clean up themselves?
Why should workers,  who could be doing work for other
workers,  helping them clean up their private houses,
where workers live,  apartment buildings where workers
live and the like,  be employed and managed by aiding
authorities, to perform low/no pay work for weathy
corporations unwilling to spend their insurance money
on same?

  Do you have any clue?  Please explain how this is
compassionate consevatism?  Making the people, the poor
and the workers wait in line for help while aid is
distributed to weathy and powerful corporations that
should be taking care of themselves.

Obwon


>+++++++++++++
>
>Reply to the list as I do not publish an email address to USENET.
>This practice has cut my spam by more than 95%.  
>Of course, I did have to abandon a perfectly good email account...

0[ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ]0
  Liars share with those they deceive 
  the desire not to be deceived.
                        --Sissela Bok
0[ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ]0