🚀 go-pugleaf

"Mike Smith" <mws@wt.net> wrote in message
news:5srni1tdor99b07040on4uopcqpccv5guf@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:03:01 -0700, wrcowan1@hal-pc.org wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Chris wrote:
> >> <wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
> >> news:43265b69$0$10624$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>So when those images get to the OPs center...what do they do with
them?
> >>>>Surely they wouldn't send the information to the troops on the ground
> >>
> >> now
> >>
> >>>>would they...I mean just because that is waht the equipment is
designed
> >>
> >> for
> >>
> >>>>doesn't mean they have to use it that way does it. Sorry, but the
> >>
> >> clueless
> >>
> >>>>one in this argument is you if you think they don't have the
capability
> >>
> >> to
> >>
> >>>>get realtime images on the ground, hell even ones an hour or two old
> >>
> >> would
> >>
> >>>>suffice....but don't let logic get in your way.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>No, I am aware of how satelitie images are gathered, used and
> >>>interpreted.  I use them all the time.  First satelite resources have
to
> >>>be moved into place.  Then the information gathered.  It does not get
> >>>instantly analyized nor does it get directly into the field.  Even if
> >>>satelite information is available it still may not tell you if a road
is
> >>>passable (debris or obstacles) or even how high the water is.  I know
we
> >>>can get real time images in to the field but we do not have people in
> >>>field who have the skills to do interpretation that you are suggesting
> >>>to be done.  It is one thing to get images showing armor, vehiclesand
> >>>emplacements but it is another to use it to tell you water depths or
> >>>hidden obstacles.
> >>>
> >>>MRC
> >>
> >>
> >> So you are still saying that if you can see a car up to it's wheels in
water
> >> that you can't tell how deep it is? Maybe you need to learn what the
> >> capabilities really are.
> >
> >
> >I see you have been watching too many movies.  I suggest you study a
> >little bit about aerial photgraphic interpretation and remote sensing.
> >Also you act as if there is a car hub cap at every intersection.
> >
> >I am fully aware of the capabilities of the resource available as well
> >as limitations.  The men on the ground do not get 6in, or 1 ft
> >resolution images.  Many times it is 1m or 3 m resolution images.
> >
> >MRC
>
> And, of course, with their "x-ray" vision, they can tell if the road
> is washed out 2 feet in front of the semi-submerged car wheels...
>
> Liberals... No analytical abilities... Whatareyagonnado?
>
> Mike Smith

Republicans, no clue so they do nothing instead....