🚀 go-pugleaf

Leonidas Rex <leonidas_rex@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<ZWWAc.96555$Gx4.6908@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>...
> A Jewish Defector Warns America 
> 
> 
> Introductory Note: 
> 
> Benjamin H. Freedman was one of the most intriguing and amazing individuals 
> of the 20th century. Born in 1890, he was a successful Jewish businessman 
> of New York City at one time principal owner of the Woodbury Soap Company. 
> He broke with organized Jewry after the Judeo-Communist victory of 1945, 
> and spent the remainder of his life and the great preponderance of his 
> considerable fortune, at least 2.5 million dollars, exposing the Jewish 
> tyranny which has enveloped the United States. 
> 
> Mr. Freedman knew what he was talking about because he had been an insider 
> at the highest levels of Jewish organizations and Jewish machinations to 
> gain power over our nation. Mr. Freedman was personally acquainted with 
> Bernard Baruch, Samuel Untermyer, Woodrow Wilson, Franklin Roosevelt, 
> Joseph Kennedy, John F. Kennedy, and many more movers and shakers of our 
> times. 
> 
> 
> This speech was given before a patriotic audience in 1961 at the Willard 
> Hotel, Washington, D.C., on behalf of Conde McGinley's patriotic newspaper 
> of that time, Common Sense. Though in some minor ways this wide-ranging and 
> extemporaneous speech has become dated, Mr. Freedman's essential message to 
> us -- his warning to the West -- is more urgent than ever before. -- K.A.S. 
> 
> 
> 
> Benjamin Freedman Speaks:
> 
> 
> Here in the United States, the Zionists and their co-religionists have 
> complete control of our government. For many reasons, too many and too 
> complex to go into here at this time, the Zionists and their 
> co-religionists rule these United States as though they were the absolute 
> monarchs of this country. Now you may say that is a very broad statement, 
> but let me show you what happened while we were all asleep. 
> 
> What happened? World War I broke out in the summer of 1914. There are few 
> people here my age who remember that. Now that war was waged on one side by 
> Great Britain, France, and Russia; and on the other side by Germany, 
> Austria-Hungary, and Turkey. 
> 
> 
> Within two years Germany had won that war: not only won it nominally, but 
> won it actually. The German submarines, which were a surprise to the world, 
> had swept all the convoys from the Atlantic Ocean. Great Britain stood 
> there without ammunition for her soldiers, with one week's food supply -- 
> and after that, starvation. At that time, the French army had mutinied. 
> They had lost 600,000 of the flower of French youth in the defense of 
> Verdun on the Somme. The Russian army was defecting, they were picking up 
> their toys and going home, they didn't want to play war anymore, they 
> didn't like the Czar. And the Italian army had collapsed. 
> 
> 
> Not a shot had been fired on German soil. Not one enemy soldier had crossed 
> the border into Germany. And yet, Germany was offering England peace terms. 
> They offered England a negotiated peace on what the lawyers call a status 
> quo ante basis. That means: "Let's call the war off, and let everything be 
> as it was before the war started." England, in the summer of 1916 was 
> considering that -- seriously. They had no choice. It was either accepting 
> this negotiated peace that Germany was magnanimously offering them, or 
> going on with the war and being totally defeated. 
> 
> 
> While that was going on, the Zionists in Germany, who represented the 
> Zionists from Eastern Europe, went to the British War Cabinet and -- I am 
> going to be brief because it's a long story, but I have all the documents 
> to prove any statement that I make -- they said: "Look here. You can yet 
> win this war. You don't have to give up. You don't have to accept the 
> negotiated peace offered to you now by Germany. You can win this war if the 
> United States will come in as your ally." The United States was not in the 
> war at that time. We were fresh; we were young; we were rich; we were 
> powerful. They told England: "We will guarantee to bring the United States 
> into the war as your ally, to fight with you on your side, if you will 
> promise us Palestine after you win the war." In other words, they made this 
> deal: "We will get the United States into this war as your ally. The price 
> you must pay is Palestine after you have won the war and defeated Germany, 
> Austria-Hungary, and Turkey." Now England had as much right to promise 
> Palestine to anybody, as the United States would have to promise Japan to 
> Ireland for any reason whatsoever. It's absolutely absurd that Great 
> Britain, that never had any connection or any interest or any right in what 
> is known as Palestine should offer it as coin of the realm to pay the 
> Zionists for bringing the United States into the war. However, they did 
> make that promise, in October of 1916. And shortly after that -- I don't 
> know how many here remember it -- the United States, which was almost 
> totally pro-German, entered the war as Britain's ally. 
> 
> 
> I say that the United States was almost totally pro-German because the 
> newspapers here were controlled by Jews, the bankers were Jews, all the 
> media of mass communications in this country were controlled by Jews; and 
> they, the Jews, were pro-German. They were pro-German because many of them 
> had come from Germany, and also they wanted to see Germany lick the Czar. 
> The Jews didn't like the Czar, and they didn't want Russia to win this war. 
> These German-Jew bankers, like Kuhn Loeb and the other big banking firms in 
> the United States refused to finance France or England to the extent of one 
> dollar. They stood aside and they said: "As long as France and England are 
> tied up with Russia, not one cent!" But they poured money into Germany, 
> they fought beside Germany against Russia, trying to lick the Czarist 
> regime. 
> 
> 
> Now those same Jews, when they saw the possibility of getting Palestine, 
> went to England and they made this deal. At that time, everything changed, 
> like a traffic light that changes from red to green. Where the newspapers 
> had been all pro-German, where they'd been telling the people of the 
> difficulties that Germany was having fighting Great Britain commercially 
> and in other respects, all of a sudden the Germans were no good. They were 
> villains. They were Huns. They were shooting Red Cross nurses. They were 
> cutting off babies' hands. They were no good. Shortly after that, Mr. 
> Wilson declared war on Germany. 
> 
> 
> The Zionists in London had sent cables to the United States, to Justice 
> Brandeis, saying "Go to work on President Wilson. We're getting from 
> England what we want. Now you go to work on President Wilson and get the 
> United States into the war." That's how the United States got into the war. 
> We had no more interest in it; we had no more right to be in it than we 
> have to be on the moon tonight instead of in this room. There was 
> absolutely no reason for World War I to be our war. We were railroaded into 
> -- if I can be vulgar, we were suckered into -- that war merely so that the 
> Zionists of the world could obtain Palestine. That is something that the 
> people of the United States have never been told. They never knew why we 
> went into World War I. 
> 
> 
> After we got into the war, the Zionists went to Great Britain and they said: 
> "Well, we performed our part of the agreement. Let's have something in 
> writing that shows that you are going to keep your bargain and give us 
> Palestine after you win the war." They didn't know whether the war would 
> last another year or another ten years. So they started to work out a 
> receipt. The receipt took the form of a letter, which was worded in very 
> cryptic language so that the world at large wouldn't know what it was all 
> about. And that was called the Balfour Declaration. 
> 
> 
> The Balfour Declaration was merely Great Britain's promise to pay the 
> Zionists what they had agreed upon as a consideration for getting the 
> United States into the war. So this great Balfour Declaration, that you 
> hear so much about, is just as phony as a three dollar bill. I don't think 
> I could make it more emphatic than that. 
> 
> 
> That is where all the trouble started. The United States got in the war. The 
> United States crushed Germany. You know what happened. When the war ended, 
> and the Germans went to Paris for the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 there 
> were 117 Jews there, as a delegation representing the Jews, headed by 
> Bernard Baruch. I was there: I ought to know. 
> 
> 
> Now what happened? The Jews at that peace conference, when they were cutting 
> up Germany and parceling out Europe to all these nations who claimed a 
> right to a certain part of European territory, said, "How about Palestine 
> for us?" And they produced, for the first time to the knowledge of the 
> Germans, this Balfour Declaration. So the Germans, for the first time 
> realized, "Oh, so that was the game! That's why the United States came into 
> the war." The Germans for the first time realized that they were defeated, 
> they suffered the terrific reparations that were slapped onto them, because 
> the Zionists wanted Palestine and were determined to get it at any cost. 
> 
> 
> That brings us to another very interesting point. When the Germans realized 
> this, they naturally resented it. Up to that time, the Jews had never been 
> better off in any country in the world than they had been in Germany. You 
> had Mr. Rathenau there, who was maybe 100 times as important in industry 
> and finance as is Bernard Baruch in this country. You had Mr. Balin, who 
> owned the two big steamship lines, the North German Lloyd's and the 
> Hamburg-American Lines. You had Mr. Bleichroder, who was the banker for the 
> Hohenzollern family. You had the Warburgs in Hamburg, who were the big 
> merchant bankers -- the biggest in the world. The Jews were doing very well 
> in Germany. No question about that. The Germans felt: "Well, that was quite 
> a sellout." 
> 
> 
> It was a sellout that might be compared to this hypothetical situation: 
> Suppose the United States was at war with the Soviet Union. And we were 
> winning. And we told the Soviet Union: "Well, let's quit. We offer you 
> peace terms. Let's forget the whole thing." And all of a sudden Red China 
> came into the war as an ally of the Soviet Union. And throwing them into 
> the war brought about our defeat. A crushing defeat, with reparations the 
> likes of which man's imagination cannot encompass. Imagine, then, after 
> that defeat, if we found out that it was the Chinese in this country, our 
> Chinese citizens, who all the time we had thought were loyal citizens 
> working with us, were selling us out to the Soviet Union and that it was 
> through them that Red China was brought into the war against us. How would 
> we feel, then, in the United States against Chinese? I don't think that one 
> of them would dare show his face on any street. There wouldn't be enough 
> convenient lampposts to take care of them. Imagine how we would feel. 
> 
> 
> Well, that's how the Germans felt towards these Jews. They'd been so nice to 
> them: from 1905 on, when the first Communist revolution in Russia failed, 
> and the Jews had to scramble out of Russia, they all went to Germany. And 
> Germany gave them refuge. And they were treated very nicely. And here they 
> had sold Germany down the river for no reason at all other than the fact 
> that they wanted Palestine as a so-called "Jewish commonwealth." 
> 
> 
> Now Nahum Sokolow, and all the great leaders and great names that you read 
> about in connection with Zionism today, in 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922, and 1923 
> wrote in all their papers -- and the press was filled with their statements 
> -- that the feeling against the Jews in Germany is due to the fact that 
> they realized that this great defeat was brought about by Jewish 
> intercession in bringing the United States into the war. The Jews 
> themselves admitted that. It wasn't that the Germans in 1919 discovered 
> that a glass of Jewish blood tasted better than Coca-Cola or Muenschner 
> Beer. There was no religious feeling. There was no sentiment against those 
> people merely on account of their religious belief. It was all political. 
> It was economic. It was anything but religious. Nobody cared in Germany 
> whether a Jew went home and pulled down the shades and said "Shema 
> 'Yisroel" or "Our Father." Nobody cared in Germany any more than they do in 
> the United States. Now this feeling that developed later in Germany was due 
> to one thing: the Germans held the Jews responsible for their crushing 
> defeat. 
> 
> 
> And World War I had been started against Germany for no reason for which 
> Germany was responsible. They were guilty of nothing. Only of being 
> successful. They built up a big navy. They built up world trade. You must 
> remember that Germany at the time of the French Revolution consisted of 300 
> small city-states, principalities, dukedoms, and so forth. Three hundred 
> separate little political entities. And between that time, between the 
> times of Napoleon and Bismarck, they were consolidated into one state. And 
> within 50 years they became one of the world's great powers. Their navy was 
> rivaling Great Britain's, they were doing business all over the world, they 
> could undersell anybody, they could make better products. What happened as 
> a result of that? 
> 
> 
> There was a conspiracy between England, France, and Russia to slap down 
> Germany. There isn't one historian in the world who can find a valid reason 
> why those three countries decided to wipe Germany off the map politically. 
> 
> 
> When Germany realized that the Jews were responsible for her defeat, they 
> naturally resented it. But not a hair on the head of any Jew was harmed. 
> Not a single hair. Professor Tansill, of Georgetown University, who had 
> access to all the secret papers of the State Department, wrote in his book, 
> and quoted from a State Department document written by Hugo Schoenfelt, a 
> Jew whom Cordell Hull sent to Europe in 1933 to investigate the so-called 
> camps of political prisoners, who wrote back that he found them in very 
> fine condition. They were in excellent shape, with everybody treated well. 
> And they were filled with Communists. Well, a lot of them were Jews, 
> because the Jews happened to comprise about 98 per cent of the Communists 
> in Europe at that time. And there were some priests there, and ministers, 
> and labor leaders, and Masons, and others who had international 
> affiliations. 
> 
> 
> Some background is in order: In 1918-1919 the Communists took over Bavaria 
> for a few days. Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebknecht and a group of other 
> Jews took over the government for three days. In fact, when the Kaiser 
> ended the war he fled to Holland because he thought the Communists were 
> going to take over Germany as they did Russia and that he was going to meet 
> the same fate as the Czar. So he fled to Holland for safety, for security. 
> After the Communist threat in Germany was quashed, the Jews were still 
> working, trying to get back into their former status, and the Germans 
> fought them in every way they could without hurting a single hair on 
> anyone's head. They fought them the same way that, in this country, the 
> Prohibitionists fought anyone who was interested in liquor. They didn't 
> fight one another with pistols. Well, that's the way they were fighting the 
> Jews in Germany. And at that time, mind you, there were 80 to 90 million 
> Germans, and there were only 460,000 Jews. About one half of one per cent 
> of the population of Germany were Jews. And yet they controlled all the 
> press, and they controlled most of the economy because they had come in 
> with cheap money when the mark was devalued and bought up practically 
> everything. 
> 
> 
> The Jews tried to keep a lid on this fact. They didn't want the world to 
> really understand that they had sold out Germany, and that the Germans 
> resented that. 
> 
> 
> The Germans took appropriate action against the Jews. They, shall I say, 
> discriminated against them wherever they could. They shunned them. The same 
> way that we would shun the Chinese, or the Negroes, or the Catholics, or 
> anyone in this country who had sold us out to an enemy and brought about 
> our defeat. 
> 
> 
> After a while, the Jews of the world called a meeting in Amsterdam. Jews 
> from every country in the world attended this meeting in July 1933. And 
> they said to Germany: "You fire Hitler, and you put every Jew back into his 
> former position, whether he was a Communist or no matter what he was. You 
> can't treat us that way. And we, the Jews of the world, are serving an 
> ultimatum upon you." You can imagine what the Germans told them. So what 
> did the Jews do? 
> 
> 
> In 1933, when Germany refused to surrender to the world conference of Jews 
> in Amsterdam, the conference broke up, and Mr. Samuel Untermyer, who was 
> the head of the American delegation and the president of the whole 
> conference, came to the United States and went from the steamer to the 
> studios of the Columbia Broadcasting System and made a radio broadcast 
> throughout the United States in which he in effect said, "The Jews of the 
> world now declare a Holy War against Germany. We are now engaged in a 
> sacred conflict against the Germans. And we are going to starve them into 
> surrender. We are going to use a world-wide boycott against them. That will 
> destroy them because they are dependent upon their export business." 
> 
> 
> And it is a fact that two thirds of Germany's food supply had to be 
> imported, and it could only be imported with the proceeds of what they 
> exported. So if Germany could not export, two thirds of Germany's 
> population would have to starve. There was just not enough food for more 
> than one third of the population. Now in this declaration, which I have 
> here, and which was printed in the New York Times on August 7, 1933, Mr. 
> Samuel Untermyer boldly stated that "this economic boycott is our means of 
> self-defense. President Roosevelt has advocated its use in the National 
> Recovery Administration," which some of you may remember, where everybody 
> was to be boycotted unless he followed the rules laid down by the New Deal, 
> and which was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of that time. 
> Nevertheless, the Jews of the world declared a boycott against Germany, and 
> it was so effective that you couldn't find one thing in any store anywhere 
> in the world with the words "Made in Germany" on it. In fact, an executive 
> of the Woolworth Company told me that they had to dump millions of dollars 
> worth of crockery and dishes into the river; that their stores were 
> boycotted if anyone came in and found a dish marked "made in Germany," they 
> were picketed with signs saying "Hitler," "murderer," and so forth, 
> something like these sit-ins that are taking place in the South. 
> 
> 
> At a store belonging to the R. H. Macy chain, which was controlled by a 
> family called Strauss who also happen to be Jews, a woman found stockings 
> there which came from Chemnitz, marked "Made in Germany." Well, they were 
> cotton stockings and they may have been there 20 years, since I've been 
> observing women's legs for many years and it's been a long time since I've 
> seen any cotton stockings on them. I saw Macy's boycotted, with hundreds of 
> people walking around with signs saying "murderers," "Hitlerites," and so 
> forth. 
> 
> 
> Now up to that time, not one hair on the head of any Jew had been hurt in 
> Germany. There was no suffering, there was no starvation, there was no 
> murder, there was nothing. 
> 
> 
> Naturally, the Germans said, "Who are these people to declare a boycott 
> against us and throw all our people out of work, and make our industries 
> come to a standstill? Who are they to do that to us?" They naturally 
> resented it. Certainly they painted swastikas on stores owned by Jews. Why 
> should a German go in and give his money to a storekeeper who was part of a 
> boycott that was going to starve Germany into surrendering to the Jews of 
> the world, who were going to dictate who their premier or chancellor was to 
> be? Well, it was ridiculous. 
> 
> 
> The boycott continued for some time, but it wasn't until 1938, when a young 
> Jew from Poland walked into the German embassy in Paris and shot a German 
> official, that the Germans really started to get rough with the Jews in 
> Germany. And you found them then breaking windows and having street fights 
> and so forth. 
> 
> 
> Now I don't like to use the word "anti-Semitism" because it's meaningless, 
> but it means something to you still, so I'll have to use it. The only 
> reason that there was any feeling in Germany against Jews was that they 
> were responsible for World War I and for this world-wide boycott. 
> Ultimately they were also responsible for World War II, because after this 
> thing got out of hand, it was absolutely necessary for the Jews and Germany 
> to lock horns in a war to see which one was going to survive. In the 
> meanwhile, I had lived in Germany, and I knew that the Germans had decided 
> that Europe is going to be Christian or Communist: there is no in between. 
> And the Germans decided they were going to keep it Christian if possible. 
> And they started to re-arm. In November 1933 the United States recognized 
> the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union was becoming very powerful, and Germany 
> realized that "Our turn was going to come soon, unless we are strong." The 
> same as we in this country are saying today, "Our turn is going to come 
> soon, unless we are strong." Our government is spending 83 or 84 billion 
> dollars for defense. Defense against whom? Defense against 40,000 little 
> Jews in Moscow that took over Russia, and then, in their devious ways, took 
> over control of many other countries of the world. 
> 
> 
> For this country now to be on the verge of a Third World War, from which we 
> cannot emerge a victor, is something that staggers my imagination. I know 
> that nuclear bombs are measured in terms of megatons. A megaton is a term 
> used to describe one million tons of TNT. Our nuclear bombs had a capacity 
> of 10 megatons, or 10 million tons of TNT, when they were first developed. 
> Now, the nuclear bombs that are being developed have a capacity of 200 
> megatons, and God knows how many megatons the nuclear bombs of the Soviet 
> Union have. 
> 
> 
> What do we face now? If we trigger a world war that may develop into a 
> nuclear war, humanity is finished. Why might such a war take place? It will 
> take place as the curtain goes up on Act 3: Act 1 was World War I, Act 2 
> was World War II, Act 3 is going to be World War III. The Jews of the 
> world, the Zionists and their co-religionists everywhere, are determined 
> that they are going to again use the United States to help them permanently 
> retain Palestine as their foothold for their world government. That is just 
> as true as I am standing here. Not alone have I read it, but many here have 
> also read it, and it is known all over the world. 
> 
> 
> What are we going to do? The life you save may be your son's. Your boys may 
> be on their way to that war tonight; and you don't know it any more than 
> you knew that in 1916 in London the Zionists made a deal with the British 
> War Cabinet to send your sons to war in Europe. Did you know it at that 
> time? Not a person in the United States knew it. You weren't permitted to 
> know it. Who knew it? President Wilson knew it. Colonel House knew it. 
> Other insiders knew it. 
> 
> 
> Did I know it? I had a pretty good idea of what was going on: I was liaison 
> to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., in the 1912 campaign when President Wilson was 
> elected, and there was talk around the office there. I was "confidential 
> man" to Henry Morgenthau, Sr., who was chairman of the Finance Committee, 
> and I was liaison between him and Rollo Wells, the treasurer. So I sat in 
> these meetings with President Wilson at the head of the table, and all the 
> others, and I heard them drum into President Wilson's brain the graduated 
> income tax and what has become the Federal Reserve, and I heard them 
> indoctrinate him with the Zionist movement. Justice Brandeis and President 
> Wilson were just as close as the two fingers on this hand. President 
> Woodrow Wilson was just as incompetent when it came to determining what was 
> going on as a newborn baby. That is how they got us into World War I, while 
> we all slept. They sent our boys over there to be slaughtered. For what? So 
> the Jews can have Palestine as their "commonwealth." They've fooled you so 
> much that you don't know whether you're coming or going. 
> 
> 
> Now any judge, when he charges a jury, says, "Gentlemen, any witness who you 
> find has told a single lie, you can disregard all his testimony." I don't 
> know what state you come from, but in New York state that is the way a 
> judge addresses a jury. If that witness told one lie, disregard his 
> testimony. 
> 
> 
> What are the facts about the Jews? (I call them Jews to you, because they 
> are known as "Jews". I don't call them Jews myself. I refer to them as 
> "so-called Jews", because I know what they are). The eastern European Jews, 
> who form 92 per cent of the world's population of those people who call 
> themselves "Jews", were originally Khazars. They were a warlike tribe who 
> lived deep in the heart of Asia. And they were so warlike that even the 
> Asiatics drove them out of Asia into eastern Europe. They set up a large 
> Khazar kingdom of 800,000 square miles. At the time, Russia did not exist, 
> nor did many other European countries. The Khazar kingdom was the biggest 
> country in all Europe -- so big and so powerful that when the other 
> monarchs wanted to go to war, the Khazars would lend them 40,000 soldiers. 
> That's how big and powerful they were. 
> 
> 
> They were phallic worshippers, which is filthy and I do not want to go into 
> the details of that now. But that was their religion, as it was also the 
> religion of many other pagans and barbarians elsewhere in the world. The 
> Khazar king became so disgusted with the degeneracy of his kingdom that he 
> decided to adopt a so-called monotheistic faith -- either Christianity, 
> Islam, or what is known today as Judaism, which is really Talmudism. By 
> spinning a top, and calling out "eeny, meeny, miney, moe," he picked out 
> so-called Judaism. And that became the state religion. He sent down to the 
> Talmudic schools of Pumbedita and Sura and brought up thousands of rabbis, 
> and opened up synagogues and schools, and his people became what we call 
> "Jews". 
> 
> 
> There wasn't one of them who had an ancestor who ever put a toe in the Holy 
> Land. Not only in Old Testament history, but back to the beginning of time. 
> Not one of them! And yet they come to the Christians and ask us to support 
> their armed insurrections in Palestine by saying, "You want to help 
> repatriate God's Chosen People to their Promised Land, their ancestral 
> home, don't you? It's your Christian duty. We gave you one of our boys as 
> your Lord and Savior. You now go to church on Sunday, and you kneel and you 
> worship a Jew, and we're Jews." 
> 
> 
> But they are pagan Khazars who were converted just the same as the Irish 
> were converted. It is as ridiculous to call them "people of the Holy Land," 
> as it would be to call the 54 million Chinese Moslems "Arabs." Mohammed 
> only died in 620 A.D., and since then 54 million Chinese have accepted 
> Islam as their religious belief. Now imagine, in China, 2,000 miles away 
> from Arabia, from Mecca and Mohammed's birthplace. Imagine if the 54 
> million Chinese decided to call themselves "Arabs." You would say they were 
> lunatics. Anyone who believes that those 54 million Chinese are Arabs must 
> be crazy. All they did was adopt as a religious faith a belief that had its 
> origin in Mecca, in Arabia. The same as the Irish. When the Irish became 
> Christians, nobody dumped them in the ocean and imported to the Holy Land a 
> new crop of inhabitants. They hadn't become a different people. They were 
> the same people, but they had accepted Christianity as a religious faith. 
> 
> 
> These Khazars, these pagans, these Asiatics, these Turko-Finns, were a 
> Mongoloid race who were forced out of Asia into eastern Europe. Because 
> their king took the Talmudic faith, they had no choice in the matter. Just 
> the same as in Spain: If the king was Catholic, everybody had to be a 
> Catholic. If not, you had to get out of Spain. So the Khazars became what 
> we call today "Jews".
> 
> 
> Now imagine how silly it was for the great Christian countries of the world 
> to say, "We're going to use our power and prestige to repatriate God's 
> Chosen People to their ancestral homeland, their Promised Land." Could 
> there be a bigger lie than that? Because they control the newspapers, the 
> magazines, the radio, the television, the book publishing business, and 
> because they have the ministers in the pulpit and the politicians on the 
> soapboxes talking the same language, it is not too surprising that you 
> believe that lie. You'd believe black is white if you heard it often 
> enough. You wouldn't call black black anymore -- you'd start to call black 
> white. And nobody could blame you. That is one of the great lies of 
> history. It is the foundation of all the misery that has befallen the 
> world.
> 
> 
> Do you know what Jews do on the Day of Atonement, that you think is so 
> sacred to them? I was one of them. This is not hearsay. I'm not here to be 
> a rabble-rouser. I'm here to give you facts. When, on the Day of Atonement, 
> you walk into a synagogue, you stand up for the very first prayer that you 
> recite. It is the only prayer for which you stand. You repeat three times a 
> short prayer called the Kol Nidre. In that prayer, you enter into an 
> agreement with God Almighty that any oath, vow, or pledge that you may make 
> during the next twelve months shall be null and void. The oath shall not be 
> an oath; the vow shall not be a vow; the pledge shall not be a pledge. They 
> shall have no force or effect. And further, the Talmud teaches that 
> whenever you take an oath, vow, or pledge, you are to remember the Kol 
> Nidre prayer that you recited on the Day of Atonement, and you are exempted 
> from fulfilling them. How much can you depend on their loyalty? You can 
> depend upon their loyalty as much as the Germans depended upon it in 1916. 
> We are going to suffer the same fate as Germany suffered, and for the same 
> reason. 
> 
> 
> http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/
> 
> --
>  
> Has it ever occurred to defenders of the jew Holocaust that the Holocaust in 
> Cambodia under Pol Pot does not need to be authenticated by reading between 
> the lines of any particular document?
> 
> Whereas, the Holocaustrian Shoa Fest must have its authenticity verified by 
> reading between the lines of authentic and fake documents the way a bible 
> thumper reads desired meaning into the New Testament!
> 
> What a contrast!
> 
> A contrast pregnant with meaning to any thoughtful and honest man.
> 
> Damn the anti-White mind bending jews and their parasite hoax!
> 
> >>>>---------->

FYI

Tom