🚀 go-pugleaf

On 31 Dec 1998 01:46:50 GMT, dgdsk@tiac.net wrote:
>Hey, pal. I'll just bet, you know, I'll just bet, that if someone in the
>Bush White house had hired someone to pull 800 files of Democrats you
>would get just a wee bit more upset about it.

Are you ignorant or are you just trying to be dense?  Starr
investigated that charge and agreed that it was a bureaucratic
oversight.   He stated as much in a public statement.  Oh, that's
right.  You think Starr is a Clinton lackey.

I hate to debunk another one of your paranoid dittohead conspiracy
theories, it's not even remotely illegal for Clinton to have
possession of those files.  I realize your memory is selective but you
might recall that it was the Republican Judiciary Committee that
wanted Clinton to admit under oath to being the chief law enforcement
officer in the US.  He has a right to those files, and more.

Now, if you can show some evidence beyond your rabid, kneejerk hatred
of everything Clinton, that something nefarious was actually done with
those files, as was done to criminal extents by the RNC during the
Nixon campaign, you might have a reason to stand on one foot.  But of
course you don't.

>What an asshole you are.

Considering the source, thanks for the compliment, cupcake.  It's my
personal mission to be thought an asshole by assholes.

------------------[ http://www.magpie.com ]-----------=o&>o-------
Steve Manes        smanes [at] magpie.com       N'Yawk, N'Yawk