Article View: nyc.general
Article #1664Re: PROTEST THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT
From: cfortunato
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 00:00
47 lines
3185 bytes
3185 bytes
In article <757rng$nvr$1@news.ncal.verio.com>, <rocket@ccnet.com> wrote: > > cfortunato@aol.com wrote in message <7560j1$bt9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>... > >In article <3675AFAC.3128@serious.com>, > > balky@serious.com. wrote: > >> cfortunato@aol.com wrote: > >> > > >What makes you think they won't impeach Gore? They've already shown that > >they don't need real charges. Three out of the four charges against > Clinton > >they have no actual evidence for, and they're charging him with them, > anyway. > > If Gore gets in, how long do you think it will before they impeach him > over > >campaign financing - even if they have no real evidence for it? They don't > >need real charges, and they don't need public consent. So how is that > >different from a dictatorship? > You obviously believe President Clinton, and I would presume you are a > supporter. > > Please tell me, as I am a bit confused, the reason he will not just come out > with the truth? What, exactly, hasn't he told the truth about? He's admitted he lied; he's practically groveled with apology. The only thing he HASN'T admitted is breaking the law. And he has a point; he may not have. I doubt a perjury charge would stand up in a real trial. And if he DID admit breaking the law, you don't REALLY think the Reps would stop the drive for impeachment, do you? They'd say, "He ADMITTED breaking the law. We HAVE to impeach, now! BWAHAHAHA!" If you recall, several months ago, Orrin Hatch said if the President just apologized, the whole thing would probably be dropped. He apologized. Did they drop it? No, quite the opposite. Why would anyone believe these people? > For such a sharp political mind, he has missed the point; this is a > political proceeding, not a legal one. As such, I'm sure he would have been > off the hook as he has so many times before if he simply would have come out > and admitted his "unacceptable" behavior. He has. Many, many times. -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<75bm9q$6oa$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<36727A27.FDFA0013@ix.netcom.com> <74ulub$clu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3675AFAC.3128@serious.com> <7560j1$bt9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <757rng$nvr$1@news.ncal.verio.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10675b,cfe136f993da0587 X-Google-Attributes: gid10675b,public X-Google-Thread: 102fd5,c73264bb16aebb8b X-Google-Attributes: gid102fd5,public X-Google-Thread: f824f,c73264bb16aebb8b X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,public X-Google-Thread: feb97,c73264bb16aebb8b X-Google-Attributes: gidfeb97,public From: cfortunato@aol.com Subject: Re: PROTEST THE ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT Date: 1998/12/17 Message-ID: <75bm9q$6oa$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> X-Deja-AN: 423325608 References: <36727A27.FDFA0013@ix.netcom.com> <74ulub$clu$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <3675AFAC.3128@serious.com> <7560j1$bt9$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <757rng$nvr$1@news.ncal.verio.com> X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x8.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.188.199.166 Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Dec 17 19:33:13 1998 GMT Newsgroups: nyc.general,ba.politics,ba.general,nyc.politics X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; AOL 4.0; Windows 95)