Article View: nyc.general
Article #1797Re: "Tack" or "tact" (was Re: NYC Slang Needed for Newspaper Column)
From: Donna Richoux
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 00:00
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 1997 00:00
27 lines
2117 bytes
2117 bytes
John Nurick <j.nurick@ialday.ipexpay.omcay> wrote: > On 25 Jun 1997 15:19:20 GMT, trio@euronet.nl (Donna Richoux) wrote: > > >I think some people are called "clueless" who > >are very sweet. > > Conversely, one may say someone is "very sweet" in order to avoid > having to say he or she is more clueless than Dr Watson and Captain > Hastings put together. Dr. Watson I know, Captain Hastings I confess I fail to recognize. (Captain Queeg, Captain Ahab, Captain Cook, Captain Crunch, Captain Kirk...) However, one is sufficient, and I agree with your point. However, please remember I was responding to the claim "Clueless people have no tact, almost by definition!" To spell it out, someone can be ignorant and good natured, or they can be ignorant and bad natured. But since they cannot logically be described as simultaneously good natured and bad natured, because the terms imply that one quality predominates over the other, I hold that being clueless is a separate, independent state from being being either tactful or tactless. Best wishes --- Donna Richoux
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<19970628120935684305@p016.hlm.euronet.nl>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<339b0c66.5605160@news.interport.net> <5nl9km$3m1$1@comet.tomco.net> <33ad9177.4976019@snews2.zippo.com> <33AE5D91.C67@ix.netcom.com> <33AF16A4.618F@erols.com> <z6B1IJAOjBszEwhN@phesk.demon.co.uk> <TOM.97Jun24165648@tom.mvision.com> <199706251722001793185@p059.hlm.euronet.nl> <33b361a5.16728476@news.dial.pipex.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10675b,86dbe4afd465904d X-Google-Attributes: gid10675b,public X-Google-Thread: 102ffd,86dbe4afd465904d X-Google-Attributes: gid102ffd,public X-Google-Thread: 10b097,f40900480e4e7255 X-Google-Attributes: gid10b097,public X-Google-Thread: 101049,86dbe4afd465904d X-Google-Attributes: gid101049,public From: trio@euronet.nl (Donna Richoux) Subject: Re: "Tack" or "tact" (was Re: NYC Slang Needed for Newspaper Column) Date: 1997/06/28 Message-ID: <19970628120935684305@p016.hlm.euronet.nl> X-Deja-AN: 253169381 References: <339b0c66.5605160@news.interport.net> <5nl9km$3m1$1@comet.tomco.net> <33ad9177.4976019@snews2.zippo.com> <33AE5D91.C67@ix.netcom.com> <33AF16A4.618F@erols.com> <z6B1IJAOjBszEwhN@phesk.demon.co.uk> <TOM.97Jun24165648@tom.mvision.com> <199706251722001793185@p059.hlm.euronet.nl> <33b361a5.16728476@news.dial.pipex.com> Organization: EuroNet Internet Newsgroups: nyc.general,alt.usage.english,bit.listserv.words-l,dc.general