🚀 go-pugleaf

On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:46:26 GMT, women fainted and men gasped when
Smokin Dave <smokindave@smokindave.com> casually remarked:

>On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 16:24:59 GMT, kencorn@eshangrila.net wrote:
>
>>In article <3B9F4D73.D2F2FC55@WCTAtel.net>, Tom Klemesrud says...
>>>
>>>Who's Terrorizing Whom?
>>>
>>>If all those passengers carrying cell phones on Tuesday's ill-fated
>>>airliners were allowed to exercise their constitutional rights to bear
>>>arms, there would have been democracies on those planes; and, there
>>>would have been no "Attack on America."
>>>
>>>-Tom Klemesrud
>>Actually, if everyone on those flights had been armed, the worst that could 
>>have happened would have been the loss of the plane with possible accidental
>>ground damage.  
>
>??? If armed passengers are allowed on all flights, we'd have more crashes than
>we currently have. I'm not speaking only of the flights that ended at the WTC,
>but of *all* flights. Don't get me wrong, I'm all for the right to bear arms,
>but giving passengers the option of packing a rod when they board an airplane?
>Am I misunderstanding what you're saying?


jeez...can you imagine the nut cases we've had in the past (the guy
who shit on a serving cart and the other guy who freaked out and had
to be gang tackled by the passengers come to mind), if they had a
GUN????