🚀 go-pugleaf

Patricia Heil <pjayheil@erols.com> wrote in message news:<3BEE8A01.430B0F18@erols.com>...
> Who is this cowardly person posting from an anonymous remailer?
> 
> Rabbi Edeiken wrote:
> > 
> > The National Alliance web site has been very busy
> > since September 11, 2001. Do not give up and please
> > be assured; all links are functioning.
> > 
> > American Dissident Voices Internet Radio
> > http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio/
> > 
> > Free Speech
> > http://www.natvan.com/free-speech
> > 
> > Who Rules America
> > http://www.natvan.com/who-rules-america
> > 
> > What is the National Alliance
> > http://www.natvan.com/what-is-na
> > 
> > American Dissident Voices:
> > Transcripts
> > http://www.natvan.com/american-dissident-voices
> > Broadcast Schedule
> > http://www.natvan.com/radio-schedule
> > Internet Radio
> > http://www.natvan.com/internet-radio
> > Text
> > http://www.natvan.com/pub
> > 
> > National Vanguard Magazine
> > http://www.natvan.com/national-vanguard
> > 
> > Catalog
> > http://www.natvan.com/cgi-bin/webc.cgi/st_main.html
> > 
> > National Alliance in America
> > http://www.natvan.com/index.html
> > 
> > National Alliance in Canada
> > New webpage: http://www.natall.ca
> > 
> > Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds
> > http://www.natvan.com/e-book.html
> > A new book about Dr. William Pierce and the National Alliance
> > has been published on the Internet and is now available from
> > the e-book division of Barnes and Noble, the world's biggest
> > retail bookseller.
> > 
> > Now to today's informative talk.
> > 
> > American Dissident Voices Broadcast of November 10, 2001
> > 
> > Terrorism and Hate
> > By Dr. William Pierce
> > 
> > Hello!
> > 
> > I love to read my hate mail. The shriller it gets, the better I feel,
> > because shrillness is a sign of fear and lack of confidence on the part
> > of the haters. These days my hate mail is pretty shrill. And that's
> > understandable in view of the events of the past couple of months.
> > 
> > There's a lot of flag-waving and strutting and boasting by the
> > politicians and the media people and by their hangers-on among the
> > general public. I call the latter people "yahoos." A yahoo is a lot like
> > a lemming, but louder and more obnoxious.
> > 
> > "We're really giving those towel-heads in Afghanistan a licking," the
> > yahoos are bragging. "We've blown the bejesus out of them with our
> > cluster bombs and our cruise missiles, and they haven't been able to hit
> > us back with even a single missile or bomb. We've really taught them not
> > to mess with us, because we're the greatest, we're the toughest, and if
> > you even look sideways at us, we'll clean your clock."
> > 
> > That's the public stance of the politicians and the media people and the
> > yahoos and the retired generals and other "experts" hired by the media
> > to provide bellicose statements to keep the yahoos fired up, but behind
> > the confident, swaggering front all is not well. For one thing, the
> > Afghans are proving themselves a bit tougher than the Bush government
> > thought. For five weeks U.S. forces have carpet-bombed them, reduced a
> > number of their villages to rubble, destroyed their air-defense system,
> > hit every cave in which they think Osama bin Laden may be hiding with
> > bunker-busting bombs, wrecked their power plants, supplied mercenary
> > rebel forces inside Afghanistan with bribes and weapons, and repeatedly
> > predicted the imminent collapse of the Taliban government. And yet the
> > government has not collapsed, and Osama bin Laden continues to issue
> > public statements.
> > 
> > On the public-relations front, the Bush government and the Jews are
> > losing everywhere. The bought politicians in Pakistan and other places
> > may be cheering every time the Americans send their bombers over
> > Afghanistan, but the people in the streets are not. The Jews don't have
> > the total control over the mass media in every country that they have in
> > the United States, Canada, and most of Europe. The people throughout the
> > Middle East and Asia are not happy seeing on their television screens
> > night after night the bodies of Afghan villagers killed by American
> > cruise missiles. They are not happy seeing images of maimed Afghan
> > children who have lost eyes or arms or legs to American cluster bombs.
> > 
> > The Jews and the Bushites can't understand it. The people being killed
> > by the bombing of Afghanistan aren't Jews, and they aren't even
> > Americans. Why should anyone care what happens to them? Besides, the
> > Americans are dropping food packages to make up for the bombing and
> > killing. Doesn't that make everything all right? It is inconceivable to
> > the fat, smug bureaucrats in Washington, who have bought, bribed,
> > corrupted, and bullied their way around the world ever since the Second
> > World War, that there still are people in the world with a sense of
> > pride, people who care about more than money and free food and being
> > comfortable, people who will fight, even against overwhelming odds, to
> > keep their independence and their way of life.
> > 
> > It is interesting to note, by the way, that not all of the people in
> > Afghanistan are black-haired, swarthy, greasy, hook-nosed, Middle
> > Eastern types. Some of the tribes are White, with reddish-brown hair,
> > white skin, and European features. Aryan people conquered and colonized
> > that part of the world 35 centuries ago, and there are pockets of us
> > remaining in some of the mountainous, isolated areas.
> > 
> > Of course, there is no doubt that the United States eventually can whip
> > the Taliban and install a puppet government in Kabul, if the Bush
> > government is willing to drop enough cluster bombs on Afghan villages
> > and fire enough cruise missiles into Afghan cities. The U.S. military
> > machine is vastly more powerful than anything the Afghans have, and
> > Washington also has the economic resources to wage a long war of
> > attrition and starve Afghanistan into submission. Perhaps we should
> > remember, however, that the Soviet Union succeeded in setting up a
> > communist puppet government in Kabul, and then, with that puppet
> > government already in place, rocketed and bombed Afghan villages for
> > eight long years and still managed to lose the war -- and 15,000 Soviet
> > soldiers in the process.
> > 
> > On the home front there is more reason for shrillness. The anthrax
> > terror has killed only a handful of people so far, but it has had an
> > enormous psychological impact on the public. Even though the likelihood
> > of being struck by lightning is far greater than the likelihood of
> > receiving an anthrax-infected letter in the mail, many Americans have
> > been spooked. Housewives who never would be deliberate targets of an
> > anthrax attack are worrying seriously about how to sterilize their
> > incoming mail with a steam iron. And certainly every American has been
> > impressed by how much disruption can be caused by a single terrorist.
> > 
> > I am assuming that just one person or a very small group of people has
> > been preparing and mailing all of the anthrax letters, and he not only
> > has spooked the whole country, but he also has done hundreds of millions
> > of dollars worth of damage by causing postal centers, government
> > offices, and business and industrial facilities to be shut down for
> > weeks at a time for decontamination operations. And, despite an enormous
> > effort by the FBI and other secret police agencies, he hasn't been
> > caught. He can do it again whenever he wants. Or if not him, anyone else
> > with a little training in microbiology.
> > 
> > Even though most of the public really hasn't thought carefully about the
> > implications of all this and drawn any clear and concrete conclusions,
> > there is a vague but growing awareness that we all are living in a world
> > that is a bit more dangerous than most people had believed it to be.
> > There is more awareness that the government isn't omnipotent and cannot
> > guarantee everyone's safety or solve all his problems. And this
> > awareness has caused some uneasiness: not a lot for most people, but
> > enough to be perceptible, enough to steal a small amount of peace of
> > mind from the Sally Soccermoms and the Joe Sixpacks, who just want to do
> > their mall shopping and their TV viewing without intrusive worries about
> > what the next unpleasant and dangerous surprise will be.
> > 
> > It's not the Sally Soccermoms and the Joe Sixpacks who're sending me
> > hate mail, though. They don't care much about what happens outside their
> > living rooms and the nearest shopping mall: not enough, anyway, to send
> > me a hate letter. The real haters are those who have an emotional
> > investment in the destructive trends and programs that have been
> > wrecking our society and our civilization during the past half century.
> > They are the ideological egalitarians and the multiculturalists and the
> > diversity-mongers, who enthusiastically have promoted every sick and
> > perverted policy put forward by the Jewish media. They have been in
> > favor of racial hiring quotas and the lowering of academic standards in
> > order to get more non-Whites into our universities and open borders and
> > interracial sex and gun control and hate-crime laws and speech-crime
> > laws.
> > 
> > And they have been pretty cocky most of the time, because they believed
> > they were on a roll. They had the power of the government and the media
> > behind them, and they didn't see how they could lose. They really
> > believed that they could ram their filthy New World Order down
> > everyone's throat, and we couldn't do anything about it. They believed
> > that they were the inevitable wave of the future, and that nothing could
> > stop the birth of the sick, new world of enforced equality and Big
> > Brotherhood they envisioned.
> > 
> > Well, most of them still believe that, but they've had their cages
> > rattled a bit by the events of the last two months. I doubt that it has
> > occurred to any of them that when their schemes finally come unraveled,
> > and the society they have been poisoning for so many years finally gives
> > up the ghost, and they no longer have a treasonous government to protect
> > them, they will be called to account for their crimes and dealt with
> > appropriately. I doubt that any of them are afraid of that yet. They
> > still believe that they can carry on with impunity -- but there is a
> > glimmer of recognition among them of the fact that there may be
> > unforeseen dangers in what they are doing. There may be obstacles for
> > them to overcome that they hadn't counted on. There are unpredictable
> > forces at work in the world that they don't know how to deal with. And
> > here I am, continuing to nip at their heels and make a nuisance of
> > myself when they have these new problems to worry about. That's what
> > provokes them into sending me hate mail, I believe.
> > 
> > Many of the haters are Christians who believe that they are pleasing
> > Jesus by pulling the White race down to the level of the world's
> > non-Whites: the first shall be last, and the last shall be first;
> > blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth; that sort of
> > thing. You'd be surprised at how many of the hate letters I receive
> > quote verses from the Bible intended to prove to me that all of God's
> > children were created equal, and that God intended for us to mix
> > together, and that Whites, in holding themselves apart and rising above
> > the colored races, have contravened the will of God and deserve to be
> > punished, and that I, in opposing their sacred work of pulling the
> > Whites down to where God intended them to be, am being especially sinful
> > and deserve especially severe punishment.
> > 
> > About as numerous and as hateful as the Bible-thumpers are the
> > oh-so-desperate-to-be-fashionable types, who really hate me for raising
> > issues they prefer not to think about: issues that only can complicate
> > their quest for fashionableness, acceptance, approval, and prosperity in
> > the New World Order of equality and togetherness. Many of these announce
> > how unpleasantly surprised and even disgusted they are that in the 21st
> > century there still are people like me, with such old-fashioned ideas on
> > race and nationalism and the proper roles of the sexes, and with my
> > belief in human inequality and in the need for discipline and order and
> > individual responsibility and for a strong sense of racial identity.
> > 
> > These old-fashioned ideas of mine, of course, are just as valid today as
> > they ever were, but they are in conflict with the trends that these
> > fashionable types feel obliged to follow if they are to keep in step
> > with the media and be popular and prosperous. Now, if they really
> > believed that my old-fashioned ideas were not valid, then they could
> > just laugh at me and ignore me. But they have this dreadful fear, deep
> > down inside themselves, that I am right after all, and that the trends
> > they are following can lead us only to disaster and extinction. They
> > don't want to think about that, and when they were pretty confident in
> > the ability of the government to keep things moving in a Jewish
> > direction and keep people like me from rocking the boat, they didn't
> > have to think about it. But the events of the last two months have
> > shaken their confidence that the government has everything under
> > control, and these awful, old-fashioned ideas of mine are still being
> > rubbed in their faces. They wish I would shut up.
> > 
> > There's one more thing that has thrown these haters off balance and
> > provoked them into screaming at me, and that is the nagging knowledge
> > that the sudden loss of confidence and security they are feeling now is
> > not the result of anything I have said or done but rather is the
> > consequence of the policies they have been promoting and against which I
> > have been preaching for years. I certainly have never been pro-Arab or
> > pro-Muslim, but I have said over and over again that we need have no
> > fundamental conflict with Arabs or Muslims, because they are in their
> > part of the world and we are in ours. They have their religion and their
> > way of life, and we have ours. Because we are separate and both of us
> > would like to stay that way, we need have no conflict. They have oil, of
> > course, and we would like to have their oil, but they are only too happy
> > to sell it to us. So really, there is no reason for us to hate each
> > other, as long as we stay out of their affairs and they stay out of
> > ours. Separation and non-interference make good neighbors.
> > 
> > The one thing that has brought about conflict between us is the Jewish
> > lust for power and control in the Arab part of the world and our support
> > of the Jews. The fashionable set understand that as well as I do, but
> > they aren't permitted to talk about it, and they certainly don't like
> > hearing about it from me. They've always supported Jewish aggression in
> > the Middle East, just as they've always supported everything else
> > Jewish. They admire the Jews enormously, because the Jews are so rich
> > and so ruthless and seem to be able to get away with just about every
> > sort of brazen chicanery. Nevertheless, what happened two months ago is
> > a sharp reminder to them that not even those who have scrambled aboard
> > the Jewish bandwagon are guaranteed a smooth ride.
> > 
> > Finally, there is the galling fact that they have pushed for open
> > borders, while I have pushed for the exclusion of all non-Whites from
> > America, and if my policy had prevailed instead of theirs, the attack of
> > September 11 could not have taken place.
> > 
> > Anyway, what it all boils down to is that the people who thought America
> > was on the right track in becoming less White and less masculine and
> > less free and more under the thumb of the Jews are a little less
> > confident now and therefore a little more hateful. But they are no less
> > determined. They're not about to change their ways at this stage: it'll
> > take a lot more hijacked airliners, collapsed office buildings, and
> > anthrax mailings to destroy that much of their confidence. And so they
> > have reaffirmed their allegiance to the Jewish program for a totally
> > multiculturalized America, an Affirmative Action America, a mongrelized
> > America, an America that looks like an MTV set.
> > 
> > But still, they are a little less confident than they were, and this
> > loss of confidence -- this nagging fear that maybe their plan to profit
> > from the destruction of their race and of the civilization built by
> > their race may have a hitch in it after all -- this loss of confidence
> > manifests itself not only in a little more overt hatefulness but also in
> > an increased determination to crush all opposition. If those
> > old-fashioned heterosexual White males like me -- and a few
> > old-fashioned heterosexual White females as well -- refuse to go along
> > with their plan, then they'll get the secret police to make us go along.
> > If we insist on being divisive and stirring up opposition to the
> > continued multiculturalization of America, then they'll have their
> > secret police tap our telephones and intercept our mail and secretly
> > search our homes and plant bugs while we're away. They'll classify us as
> > "terrorists" and take away all our civil rights.
> > 
> > That's what they think they'll do anyway. That was the real purpose of
> > their so-called "USA PATRIOT" law. They're not really afraid of Arab
> > hijackers. They know that the Arabs aren't capable of derailing their
> > plans for "equalizing" America. The Arabs aren't capable of turning any
> > substantial portion of the American public against them. Middle Eastern
> > terrorists cannot take control of American public opinion away from
> > Hollywood and the other Jewish media.
> > 
> > If they lose their grip on America, it won't be the Taliban hunting them
> > down and stringing them up for their crimes against America and against
> > our people. The scuttling of the Bill of Rights is being done under
> > cover of the need to protect Americans from foreign terrorists, but the
> > real reason is to protect them from the wrath of the still patriotic
> > segment of the American people -- if that patriotic segment can be
> > awakened and informed and organized and inspired to act.
> > 
> > That's our job, and because we're working on that job day and night and
> > are determined to do whatever it takes to get the job done, they hate
> > us. I don't believe they really fear us yet. After all, they have the
> > secret police behind them -- they have all the repressive armed might of
> > the Federal government behind them -- and all we are able to do is talk
> > and spread facts and ideas among our people and try to get our people to
> > think for themselves and to accept their responsibility as Americans, as
> > White men and women. That's enough to make America's internal enemies,
> > whether of the Bible-thumping variety or of the ideologically
> > fashionable variety, hate us, but not enough yet to make them fear us.
> > Nevertheless, they believe it is only prudent to begin curtailing our
> > civil liberties, under the guise of protecting America from the threat
> > of foreign terrorism.
> > 
> > Thinking about all of this, I've tried to decide what the long-term
> > effect of the events of September 11 will be, besides a lot of bombed
> > Afghan villages and dead Afghans. Is it good that the cages of America's
> > internal enemies have been rattled, and their confidence has been shaken
> > a bit, even though they have been put on their guard? Or would it have
> > been better for them to have remained supremely confident that nothing
> > could halt their plan for the multiculturalization of America?
> > 
> > Is it good that they have stepped up their suppression of Americans'
> > civil liberties? Will legislative assaults on the Bill of Rights, such
> > as the USA PATRIOT law, awaken real patriots to the fact that the
> > government in Washington is far more an enemy of America's freedom than
> > Osama bin Laden is? Or will such laws intimidate wavering patriots into
> > silence and inaction?
> > 
> > I believe it's too soon for me to be able to answer these questions with
> > any degree of certainty. At this point I can't even say whether
> > terrorism is helpful or harmful or doesn't make much difference. Does it
> > hurt America in the long run by solidifying the support of the Sally
> > Soccermoms and Joe Sixpacks behind the Federal government and America's
> > other internal enemies? Or does it help America by eroding the faith of
> > the public in the ability of the government to protect them?
> > 
> > We'll have a better understanding of such questions later, because we
> > certainly will be gaining much more experience with both terrorism and
> > governmental suppression of civil liberties. America is in a downward
> > spiral now, and when we will break out of it and what roles terrorism
> > and repression will play in breaking out of it remain to be seen.
> > 
> > Meanwhile, we know what our task is, and we should let the hatred of
> > America's internal enemies that is directed against us serve to goad us
> > to ever greater effort and ever greater commitment and ever greater
> > vigilance.
> > 
> > Thanks for being with me again today.

Fine thought provking article.

Phil


> > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
> > The text above is based on a broadcast of the American Dissident
> > Voices radio program sponsored by National Vanguard Books.
> > It is distributed by e-mail each Saturday to subscribers of ADVlist.
> > 
> > To subscribe to ADVlist send an e-mail message to:
> > ADVlist-on@NatVan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
> > matter.)
> > 
> > For more information about National Vanguard Books or the
> > National Alliance see our web site at http://www.natvan.com or
> > http://www.natall.com
> > 
> > To contact us, write to:
> >      National Vanguard Books
> >      Attention:  ADVlist
> >      P.O. Box 330
> >      Hillsboro, WV  24946
> > 
> > or e-mail:  national@NatVan.com please tell us if we can post your
> > comments and if so whether you want your name or e-mail address
> > given.
> > 
> > ==>  TO BE REMOVED from ADVlist, send an e-mail message to:
> > ADVlist-off@NatVan.com (The subject and body of the message don't
> > matter.)
> > 
> > (c) 2001 National Vanguard Books