🚀 go-pugleaf

dc.general, nyc.general, dc.general, alt.revisionism, soc.culture.jewish 
[Happy Rosh Hashonah]

You should be aware that the "Reverend" Terence-Fformby Smythe is a 
well-known troll and buffoon who finally stopped posting to 
soc.culture.israel when everyone there began to either ignore him or 
treat him as the village idiot, whichever they found more convenient. 
You may wish to killfile him if you prefer the former.

He got my attention by posting to talk.politics.guns, another group to 
which I subscribe, so I will have to amuse myself by whipping him 
through the streets of this group as well until he leaves. There is a 
great scene in "King Henry VI, Part 2" in which a charlatan (Simon 
Simpcox) is indeed whipped through the streets by a beadle, to the 
delight of the watching nobility.

Note this specimen's views on "sexual diversity," shown below. Just call 
him "Cowpoker."

The Revd Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote:
[deleted]
> 
> 
> You're incompetent, Suzy.  You can't even control a killfile.  Not
> that it matters - you will continue to reply to people you have
> killfiled when you see their text quoted by others.
> 

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Terence+%22fuck+a+cow%22&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&as_qdr=all&selm=3f1e225c.5150933%40news.tiscali.co.uk&rnum=1

[Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote]
Anyone who finds sexual diversity "disgusting and distasteful" is a
bigot by his own admission.   QED.   You are a hypocrite and a bigot.
Liberals such as myself fully embrace sexual diversity and revel in
its glorious mosaic of multiculturalism (with thanks to former NYC
mayor David Dinkins for the phrase).

[I wrote]
 >>>The fact that you consider Rachel
 >>>Weisz unattractive proves that you are a deviant and possibly a 
zoophile.

[Fforby-Smythe wrote]
 >> Do you have a problem with sexual deviancy and/or bestiality?  Are you
 >> a zoophobe�?

[I wrote]
 >Since it constitutes animal abuse, I have a major problem with it, and I
 >don't think it should be legal.

[Terence Fformby-Smythe wrote]
Why do you think it constitutes animal abuse?  If you or I tried to
fuck a cow, do you think the cow would even notice?  It should not
only be legal but acceptable as a legitimate alternative lifestyle.

The fact is that animals are incapable of giving or refusing consent.
To imagine otherwise is a ridiculous anthropomorphism (look it up,
Levinstein).  Do we ask animals for their consent before we kill them
and eat them?  By comparison, getting fucked is a minor inconvenience.
----------------------------------------------------

MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

If Fformby-Smythe continues to stick his face in talk.politics.guns, I 
suggest that we use him as a village idiot. Medieval people's treatment 
of village idiots was cruel because these people couldn't help being 
what they were but Fformby-Smythe's participation as such is voluntary. 
We need feel no guilt about kicking him around (or ignoring him when he 
ceases to entertain.)

--Bill

http://www.stentorian.com/2ndamend/