🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:33:41 GMT, slim <pickin's@nyc.rr.com> wrote:

>> It's funny, Mike, how you slammed Giuliani over how he should've
>> waited before sending anyone in to Ground Zero so soon after 9/11, and
>> how you now slam Bush for not immediately jumping into New Orleans.
>
>Please repost my alleged comment where I state that, "(Ghoulee) should've
>waited before sending anyone in to Ground Zero so soon after 9/11."

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.government.abuse/msg/7d954b8acb364aa3?dmode=source&hl=en

Phil wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 19:16:53 GMT, Obwon <ob11...@att.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> >  Clue:  Lawyers routinely rely upon scientific tests, so they
> >have some idea of how long they take!  Certainly, if they do not,
> >they know who to ask!
> 
> Clue:  Tests do not take the same amount of time.  Unless one is
> familiar with the specific tests, he wouldn't know how long it would
> take.
> 
> Clue:  Giuliani was not acting as a lawyer after 911.

>FACT: Ghoulee blocked efforts to have more testing done.




>Besides, a flood and a toxic atmosphere are two very different scenarios.

No, they're the same.  In both situations, no one knows what, exactly,
the dangers are for those in the area.



>As much as I hate Ghoulee, he did show some balls by getting down there
>quickly. He could not stop the clusterfuck though he did show some leadership
>when it was needed, unlike BU$H.

Apples and oranges, Mike.  Oh, how you like those apples and oranges.
As president, Bush follows different rules and procedures than any
mayor.


>> Decide now:  should the government jump in blindly, or should it wait
>> and look over the situation when disasters happen?
>
>Neither.

Then what should the government do?


Phil
======
visit the New York City Homebrewers Guild website:
http://www.hbd.org/nychg