🚀 go-pugleaf

wrcowan1@hal-pc.org wrote:
> 
> slim wrote:
> >
> > Phil wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:58:28 GMT, slim <pickin's@nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>>Phil wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On 5 Sep 2005 23:03:13 -0700, "moorehead"
> >>>><moorehead_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>He was on vacation.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>No such thing.  Sorry!
> >>>>
> >>>>Mike is just upset that Bush wasn't down there from day one,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOWN THERE FROM DAY ONE!
> >>
> >>Doing what?  Throwing sandbags on the levee?  Risking drowning?  What
> >>should the president have done during a hurricane?
> >
> >
> > I answered your question, you drunkard. Read below.
> >
> >
> >>>HE SHOULD HAVE SHOWN COMPASSION AND LEADERSHIP.
> >>>
> >>>Instead, he took two more days on his FIVE WEEK VACATION!
> >>
> >>What should he have done while the hurricane was in New Orleans?
> >
> >
> > Mobilize the national Guard, wake Chertoff up and get Homeland
> > Security up and ready to respond to an iniment disaster.
> 
> The President can not call up or take control of the National Guard for
> a domestic issue without the Govenors approval or if he were declare an
> insurrection was occuring.
> 
> The problem that occured was between local and federal agencies trying
> to decide who was in charge.


The Office of Homeland Security overrides all state and local laws.

Was Brown buggering Chertoff while New Orleans drowned?

-- 


Donald Rumsfeld: "If you're asking if there's a direct 
link between 9/11 and Iraq, the answer is no."
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4865948/ 

On May 01, 2003, President Bush declared that, 
"Major combat operations in Iraq have ended."

"I'm the commander -- see, I don't need to explain -- 
I do not need to explain why I say things. That's the 
interesting thing about being the president. 
Maybe somebody needs to explain to me why they 
say something, but I don't feel like I owe anybody 
an explanation. " 
- George "Dubya" Bush