🚀 go-pugleaf

<wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
news:4323a3eb$0$10624$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
>
>
> Kurtz wrote:
> > <wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
> > news:43226978$0$10624$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
> >
> >>
> >>slim wrote:
> >>
> >>>wrcowan1@hal-pc.org wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>slim wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>wrcowan1@hal-pc.org wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>slim wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Phil wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>On Tue, 06 Sep 2005 19:58:28 GMT, slim <pickin's@nyc.rr.com>
wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Phil wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>On 5 Sep 2005 23:03:13 -0700, "moorehead"
> >>>>>>>>>><moorehead_johnson@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>He was on vacation.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>No such thing.  Sorry!
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>Mike is just upset that Bush wasn't down there from day one,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>HE SHOULD HAVE BEEN DOWN THERE FROM DAY ONE!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>Doing what?  Throwing sandbags on the levee?  Risking drowning?
> >
> > What
> >
> >>>>>>>>should the president have done during a hurricane?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>I answered your question, you drunkard. Read below.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>HE SHOULD HAVE SHOWN COMPASSION AND LEADERSHIP.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>Instead, he took two more days on his FIVE WEEK VACATION!
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>What should he have done while the hurricane was in New Orleans?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Mobilize the national Guard, wake Chertoff up and get Homeland
> >>>>>>>Security up and ready to respond to an iniment disaster.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>The President can not call up or take control of the National Guard
> >
> > for
> >
> >>>>>>a domestic issue without the Govenors approval or if he were declare
> >
> > an
> >
> >>>>>>insurrection was occuring.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>The problem that occured was between local and federal agencies
trying
> >>>>>>to decide who was in charge.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>The Office of Homeland Security overrides all state and local laws.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Was Brown buggering Chertoff while New Orleans drowned?
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>No, the Office of Homeland security does not override all state and
> >>>>local laws.  Its powers are no different than those of the agencies it
> >>>>oversees and coordinate.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>You are wrong.
> >>>
> >>>Others have posted thier mandate by law.
> >>>
> >>>In a time of crisis, they are large and in charge...on paper anyway.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>They are in charge of federal dollars that are doled out for rebuilding
> >>amd cleanup but that does not mean they take over the state functions.
> >>The National guard is under state controls.  HomeLand security can not
> >>take control of them.  Homelanad security can not take control of local
> >>policing agencies.  Under the direction of Govenor of Lousiana, state
> >>troopers and the National Guard keeped people and relief groups and
> >>agencies away from New Orleans.
> >>
> >>
> >>MRC
> >
> >
> > And who is controlling the BlackWater MERCENARIES as they move through
the
> > streets of NOLA tonight? Many people will have their 2nd amendment
rights
> > violated tonight, and because we gave away our 1st amendment rights to
> > ShrubCo in the name of Homeland Security, we will not see those who
insist
> > on their rights on the news tomorrow.
> >
> > Enjoy your New World Order, sleepy.
> >
> > The Constitution 1787- 2000  R.I.P.
>
>
> Who are these blackwater Mercenaries?  Have you even investigate who is
> taking the firearms?  It is the City of New Orleans!  Under the guise of
> state law!  So it is not the Feds who are doing it!  You say you are in
> favor of States Rights yet you are protesting a State Action!  The
> Federal Government has not curtailed 1st amendment rights.  They are
> still there.  the only ones who control themedia are the liberl elite!
> That is why you do, as you have put it, "not see those who insist on
> their rights on the news tomorrow."
>
> MRC

You ARE clueless, aren't you? Instead of spinnin' and blowin' smoke outa yer
ass, why don't you take a little trip down to the Library and check out the
Constitution. You obviously haven't read it since grade school. Just be
aware that your reading it at a Library will probably put you on a list
being compiled by the DHS.

Enjoy your self, mrcoward.