🚀 go-pugleaf

<wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
news:43265b71$0$10624$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
>
>
> Chris wrote:
> > <wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
> > news:4323ad10$0$10631$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
> >
> >>
> >>Chris wrote:
> >>
> >>><wrcowan1@hal-pc.org> wrote in message
> >>>news:4322710f$0$10625$a726171b@news.hal-pc.org...
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Chris wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Well considering that now the federal gubment is saying the locals
were
> >>>>>under water and overwhelmed themselves and they could not handle the
> >>>>>evacuation....makes you wonder why they didn't step in if they knew
> >>>
> >>>this.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>FIrst reason is the law.  The Federal Government can not just take
over.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Not according to the homeland securitydepartment...
> >>>
> >>
> >>Read the law on Homeland security, FEMA and the National Guard.  You
> >>will clearly see that they can not just come and take over.
> >
> >
> > You read it, I have already....notice the part about a national
disaster?
> >
>
> That still does not change the fact that the federal Government can not
> take charge from the State and local officials.  The fact it may called
> a national disaster, only means that aid as spelled out under the
> Staaford Act comes in to play.  Read the Stafford act.
>
> Read these links as Well
>
> Louisiana State Emergency Operations Plan - 2005
>
http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/STATE%20OF%20LOUISIANA%20EOP%202005.doc
>
> Southeast Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation and Sheltering Plan:
> http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/EOPSupplement1a.pdf
>
> Southwest Louisiana Hurricane Evacuation and Sheltering Plan:
> http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/EOPSupplement1b.pdf
>
> Shelter Plan:
> http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/EOPSheltersupplement.pdf
>
> Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, as
> amended by Public Law 106-390, October 30, 2000
> http://www.fema.gov/library/stafact.shtm#sec501
>
> Federal Response Plan:
> http://www.ohsep.louisiana.gov/plans/frp2003.pdf
>
> >
> >>>>  The Constitution and USC stand in the way.  Inorder to have done it
> >>>>was to declare insurrection (which is not was going on in Lousiana).
If
> >>>>that was done then the Feds would have controlled the National Guard
and
> >>>>Federal Troops could step in.  The Second reason is reality.
> >>>>Insurrection was last declared during the King Riots of the 1990's but
> >>>>that was only after The Govenor of California agreed to have it done.
> >>>>It has been a rarely used act  If it were done what do you think the
> >>>>headlines would be if a govenor was pushed aside by force and troops
> >>>>descending on a majority Black city?
> >>>>
> >>>>MRC
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Only two dead in NO?
> >>
> >>And your point?  YOu have failed to address the Constitutional issues
> >>and well as the issues of the USC.
> >>
> >>MRC
> >
> >
> > And you have just kept spinning to try and deflect the sorry ass
response by
> > bushy and company....to bad it wasn't a horse show, maybe brownie could
have
> > done a better job with it.
>
> You still have failed to address the Constitutional issues as well as
> the issues dealing with the USC.  Come on do you not have anything
> intellegent to write on the subject?
>
> MRC

Yes I do but you seem incapable of doing anything but defending bushy and
his fuckups.....so why bother....I am not going to change what you so
quaintly call your mind.