Article View: nyc.transit
Article #61Re: Is HBLR truly "light" rail?
From: scr
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00
Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 00:00
33 lines
2324 bytes
2324 bytes
On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 04:45:22 GMT, "Phil Kane" <Phil.Kane@nospam.spam> wrote: >On Fri, 01 Dec 2000 04:17:43 GMT, scr wrote: > >>CalTrain owns the ROW from SF to SJ? > > Yup. The official owner is the Peninsula Joint Powers Board, > composed of reps from San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa > Clara Counties. The Union Pacific (who bought and ate the SP > several years ago) has trackage rights on a non-interference > basis, and CalTrain has trackage rights on the UP from San Jose > south to Gilroy. The Altamont Commuter Express has trackage > rights on Caltrain from San Jose to Santa Clara, and thence on > the UP from Santa Clara through the Altamont Pass to Stockton. > > All diesel-hauled "heavy rail", all 3000 miles from NooYawk. > > ==> Watch the Doors <== > Phil Kane > Phil, I live in WA but work for a company that has an office in Monterey, CA. It's a bummer trying to get there without a rental. Last time I was there a few months ago, there was a story on the local (Santa Cruz) news about possible rail being extended to MRY. What route would that take? I assume it would be a route parallel to RT 17 from South bay to SC and then south as opposed to a route from Gilroy west. I see there is rail that goes through the old Army base, Fort Ord. scr
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<298f2tgujn929ithalevlipqnvmok506sp@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<8v9je9$2i2@netaxs.com> <ggp12t0nvojs9pad4m2igbqr6d9qi9nbmh@4ax.com> <cuvyxnansvbet.g4n41d1.pminews@ca.news.verio.net> <na9e2tkhs2ldhkno4ge7h6dgghtj0bnjmt@4ax.com> <cuvyxnansvbet.g4v8r32.pminews@ca.news.verio.net>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fd3ff,4c5d40878b3a80aa,start X-Google-Attributes: gidfd3ff,public X-Google-Thread: 112ce4,6a4a211a216351cd X-Google-Attributes: gid112ce4,public From: scr <scr1949@earthlink.net> Subject: Re: Is HBLR truly "light" rail? Date: 2000/12/01 Message-ID: <298f2tgujn929ithalevlipqnvmok506sp@4ax.com> X-Deja-AN: 699911166 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <8v9je9$2i2@netaxs.com> <ggp12t0nvojs9pad4m2igbqr6d9qi9nbmh@4ax.com> <cuvyxnansvbet.g4n41d1.pminews@ca.news.verio.net> <na9e2tkhs2ldhkno4ge7h6dgghtj0bnjmt@4ax.com> <cuvyxnansvbet.g4v8r32.pminews@ca.news.verio.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net X-Trace: news1.sttls1.wa.home.com 975676005 24.12.181.88 (Fri, 01 Dec 2000 05:06:45 PST) Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster MIME-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 05:06:45 PST Newsgroups: nyc.transit,ba.transportation