🚀 go-pugleaf

Mike Doyle <mike.doyle_RE@move_optushome.com.au> wrote in
message news:3ce23f79$0$4696$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
> Rod Speed <rod_speed@yahoo.com> wrote
>> Mike Doyle <mike.doyle_RE@move_optushome.com.au> wrote

>>> I'm not going to type a complete list of every
>>> town in Australia or NZ. Just a representative list.

>> Pity it was nothing even remotely resembling
>> anything like that with Aust.

> It covers several habitable places.

Completely useless when attempting to substantiate that terminally
stupid claim that "virtually every Australian town has ADSL"

The ONLY way you can actually substantiate a claim like
that is to list most of the towns that dont have ADSL and
show that thats a tiny subset of the total towns in Aust.

> Like I said, I cannot be bothered iterating
> every single Australian or NZ town.

Your terminally stupid claim that "virtually every
Australian town has ADSL" is just plain wrong.

> Sampling is a valid statistical method.

Sampling is completely useless when attempting to substantiate that
terminally stupid claim that "virtually every Australian town has ADSL"

>> Like I said, sheepshaggerland has always been and always will be,
>> completely and utterly irrelevant to your terminally stupid claim that
>> "virtually every Australian town has ADSL" which is just plain wrong.

> Why don't you name some Australian towns that don't
> have ADSL? Why don't you perform a random sample of
> Australian towns and see whether they have ADSL or not?

Thats why I know your terminally stupid claim is just plain wrong.

>>> And the list I published speaks for itself, doesn't it?

>> Even a stupid sheep shagger should be able to bullshit
>> its way out of its predicament MUCH better than that.

> And even a STUPID sheep shagger should be able to
> bullshit its way out of its STUPIDITIES better than that.

Wrong again. I choose to spell it that way, stupid.

>>>>> And if you belief my statement is false why
>>>>> don't you refute it with some evidence?

>>>> YOU made that claim, YOU get to provide the evidence
>>>> to substantiate that claim. THATS how it works, child.

>>> I already have substantiated my claims.

>> Like hell you ever did. Even someone as stupid as you should
>> be able to grasp that that pathetic list of just 15 Aust towns
>> doesnt qualify as "virtually every Australian town" any time soon.

> Yes I did.

Like hell you ever did. Even someone as stupid as you should
be able to grasp that that pathetic list of just 15 Aust towns
doesnt qualify as "virtually every Australian town" any time soon.

> Until corrected by evidence to the contrary,
> virtually every Australian town has ADSL.

Pathetic really. The FACT that nothing like "virtually
every Australian town has ADSL" stands regardless.

> My random sample of 15 towns

And thats a pathetically inadequate sample of the total towns in this
country on which to base a claim about "virtually every Australian town"

> shows that all of them have ADSL.

And thats a pathetically inadequate sample of the total towns in this
country on which to base a claim about "virtually every Australian town"

> My random sample of NZ towns show that a lot of them don't have ADSL.

Like I said, sheepshaggerland has always been and always will be,
completely and utterly irrelevant to your terminally stupid claim that
"virtually every Australian town has ADSL" which is just plain wrong.

All the rest of your desperate attempts to bullshit your
way out of your predicament flushed where it belongs.