🚀 go-pugleaf

What exactly has been added to the original html that enhances the web 
experience.
MOst of the new stuff, if not all, is just uneccessary ( god I hate that 
word...I forget how many n's and s's and c's all the time ) garbage.
Decent web page CONTENT seems to be a thing of the past. All we get now are 
stupid wasteful pages that serve no purpose other then to look good and even 
then 90% of pages fail to do even that.

Paul


 In article <6i3mt8$ehs$1@newsource.ihug.co.nz>, 
simpsond@removethis.tig.com.au says...
>
>Jim Nguyen wrote in message <6i21cd$9ou$1@otis.netspace.net.au>...
>
>[...]
>
>>Doubt it. Even with HDPro4, Sausage can't compete with FrontPage and
>>Microvision WebExpress for ease of use and on the fly WYSIWYG editing.
>>WebExpress takes half the time it took to create pages on HotDog.
>>Nobody has time to bother with html editing anymore. It's purely for
>>freaks who have lots of time to waste.
>
>
>You moron.  I rely almost exclusively on HTML editing.  I need the control
>over the code to ensure things like greater compatibility with older
>browsers and so forth than FrontPage et al can give me.  WYSIWYG is good for
>amateurs and those of us who use it as a prototyping tool, but with 57
>varieties of HTML still floating around the good old text editor has a long
>life ahead of it.
>
>--
>
>Beware of the Spam-Dog
>
>