🚀 go-pugleaf

MI5-Victim@mi5.gov.uk wrote:
> Data Protection application to Keith Hill MP, 2002
> 
>  In May 2002 I made a subject access application under the Data Protection Act 1998 to Keith Hill, my local MP. I was interested
> to see who he had spoken to during 1997-1999, when we were communicating by letter. The Information Commissioner's office told
> me that Mr Hill had been convicted in May 2000 under the DPA, presumably by omission of knowing the relevant law; consequently
> Mr Hill was more helpful than usual in his response to my application. For the sake of interest, I reproduce the Evening Standard
> news report here. 
> 
> Coupled to my data protection application, I asked Mr Hill; 
> 
> Additionally I ask the non-data-protection question of whether you spoke to the Police about me, about our communications or my
> faxes to Parliament, either in April 2000 or at any other time. Please identify any such communications. 
> 
> His response consisted of a computer printout, with covering letter, which are shown here. His letter says he may have spoken to
> Police about the faxes Parliament had been receiving, but his memory is unclear "at this remove in time". I suspect that his memory
> would allow him to remember whether or not he complained to Police two years previously; but it would not be to his advantage to
> remember, would it. 
> 
> The data printout spells out that I asked for Mr Hill's assistance against "BBC news readers who are spying on him through the
> television." It also contains a reference of Mr Hill's office referring my case to Social Services, to whom I am unknown. "Presents
> Challenging Issues" sounds a code, like the nursing UNDY = "Unfortunately Not Dead Yet" (but we continue to hope). 
> 
> I wrote again to Mr Hill on 13 May and told him I did not accept his apparent memory lapse regarding the police. I asked him to
> elucidate; in his response of 17 May he said he was unable to add to his earlier note on this point. 
> 
> 919
> 
> 

Maybe it's not MI5 at all, maybe everyone just doesn't like you.  Seems 
far more likely to me.

Mike