🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <yP652D3w165w@codeworks.gen.nz>, system@codeworks.gen.nz (Wayne
W. McDougall) wrote:

>stephen@waikato.ac.nz (Stephen Judd) writes:
>
>> You're a vigilante, Wayne. If you would just secure a mandate I would feel
>> much happier.
>
>Yes. I don't believe it is ever possible to gain a mandate.

I'm afraid that it is. Many groups have voted to retromoderate - it seems
likely that s.c.n-z will vote for some form of moderation, for example.

>But I'm quite happy to accept a denial of mandate; that is clear messages
>of the unacceptability of my actions, which exceed the messages of
>support.

Ok. I don't support this. Killfiles, killfiles, killfiles.

>Oh, and slightly at a tangent: take a good look at nz.general. I'd
>suggest it hasn't lost any of its swere like charm. It is not like my
>actions are extreme (IMO). And so far no one has contradicted that O.

May I suggest that unilaterally cancelling 450k of messages, without even
announcing your intentions in advance, is extreme in itself.

stephen "the road to hell is paved with good intentions" judd

-- 
Stephen Judd                       | Warning! I have a greater
User Support Consultant            | than average number of legs. 
School of Education                |         Want my PGP key?
University of Waikato, New Zealand |  http://poet.soe.waikato.ac.nz/