Re: The gun debate and aus.politics

Article View: nz.general

Article #3854

#3854

From: Charlie Bailey
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 1997 00:00

13 lines
1400 bytes


> Mark (still waiting for someone to tell him why a .410 5 shot, pump
>       shotgun is illegal and a .512 nitro express 5 shot, pump action
>       rifle is not; or indeed, why me owning a .22LR RF semi-auto 
Pistol 
>       is oki doki by the government but owning a .22LR RF semi-auto
>       longarm is not...) Addinall.

 
But they're not.  I can't see anywhere in the arms act where it states 
owning either a .410 pump action shotgun or a .22LR semi is illegal 
providing you hold the proper license.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <VA.0000002c.0163376a@ppp1-03.mlb.planet.gen.nz>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References: <AF0CD8CC9668E6AF5@betty-p05.netinfo.com.au><32EA4439.3EA2@bellsouth.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f7e6c,5d89fc81a649cede
X-Google-Attributes: gidf7e6c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10df0c,5d89fc81a649cede
X-Google-Attributes: gid10df0c,public
X-Google-Thread: 10004d,5d89fc81a649cede
X-Google-Attributes: gid10004d,public
X-Google-Thread: 1044e7,5d89fc81a649cede
X-Google-Attributes: gid1044e7,public
X-Google-Thread: 114a4e,5d89fc81a649cede
X-Google-Attributes: gid114a4e,public
From: Charlie Bailey <vlad@mlb.planet.gen.nz>
Subject: Re: The gun debate and aus.politics
Date: 1997/03/01
Message-ID: <VA.0000002c.0163376a@ppp1-03.mlb.planet.gen.nz>
X-Deja-AN: 222206242
References: <AF0CD8CC9668E6AF5@betty-p05.netinfo.com.au><32EA4439.3EA2@bellsouth.net>
Organization: Wibble
Reply-To: vlad@mlb.planet.gen.nz
Newsgroups: nz.general,aus.politics,talk.politics.guns,can.talk.guns,soc.culture.australian

Reply to Parent Message