🚀 go-pugleaf

BREAKING NEWS:  PHOTOS OF CHEMICAL DRUM (PIPING SYSTEM)
DISPERSEMENT PROGRAMME EQUIPMENT INSIDE AIRCRAFT


Government Dis-Information Psy-Ops Trolls
Are Trying To Present Government Designed
Web-Pages -- Stating That The Pictures Denote
BALLAST TESTS.

Cannisters (Drums) That Have Piping Attached To
Each One -- ARE NOT THERE FOR BALLAST TESTING
BUT RATHER TOTALLY PROVES THAT THEY ARE
CONNECTED WITH PIPING SYSTEM FOR CHEMICAL
DISPERSEMENT JUST AS ALLEGED.

THE GOVERNMENT TOADS WHO ARE INVOLVED
IN ALREADY ADMITTED N.A.S.A. CHEMICAL DISPERSEMENT
CHEMTRAIL POISONING OF THE SKIES ARE VERY
PREPARED WITH THEIR OWN PREPARED WEBPAGES
DESIGNED TO DE-BUNK REALITY.  THE REALITY
THAT N.A.S.A HAS ALREADY ADMITTED DOING THESE
THINGS FOR CLOSE TO 20 YEARS !

THE PIPING ON EACH CANNISTER (DRUM) PROVES
THE ALLEGATIONS OF CHEMICAL DISPERSEMENT.
NOT BALLAST TESTING !

--------------------------------------------


BREAKING NEWS --
PHOTOS OF CHEMICAL DISPERSEMENT EQUIPMENT
INSIDE AIRCRAFT:

http://www.exorcist.org.nz/chemtrails_1.png
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/chemtrails_2.png
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/chemtrails_3.png



COST OF CHEMTRAIL PROGRAM PUT AT $5 BILLION A YEAR
http://www.prisonplanet.com/cost-of-chemtrail-program-put-at-5-billion-a-year.html


New study looks at specially adapted aircraft
to disperse particles into upper atmosphere


Paul Joseph Watson
http://www.prisonplanet


5 September, 2012

The cost of a massive program to spray sun-dimming particles into the upper
atmosphere in the name of halting global warming, a process some contend is
already underway via chemtrails, has been put at just below $5 billion
dollars a year.

U.S. scientists writing in the journal Environmental Research Letters
concluded that “Planes or airships could carry sun-dimming materials high
into the atmosphere for an affordable price tag of below $5 billion a year
as a way to slow climate change,” reports Reuters, a process characterized
as “both feasible and affordable.”
The cost of using specially adapted aircraft able to operate at high
altitudes as a delivery system to disperse sulphur particles was put at $1
to $2 billion a year. Using “giant guns or rockets” would be more expensive.
Co-author Professor Jay Apt of Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh told
Reuters that injecting the atmosphere with sulphur but then suddenly
removing it from the eco-system could cause temperatures to jump, indicating
that the program would have to be ongoing in perpetuity.
The study completely failed to analyze whether such a massive geoengineering
program would be a good idea and what environmental consequences it would
have.
The latest study follows a similar Carnegie Institution for Science proposal
which also advocated spraying the upper atmosphere with aerosols, a process
that would “reduce by 20 per cent the amount of sunlight that takes a direct
route to the ground” and make blue skies “fade to hazy white,” the New
Scientist reported.

Given the fact that most advancements in science and technology are already
taking place years before they are disclosed to the public, it stands to
reason that geoengineering programs based around spraying the upper
atmosphere with particles are already underway, most notably in the form of
chemtrails, contrails that linger in the sky for hours and form into
artificial clouds.
Scientists now admit that vapor trails from airplanes are creating
“artificial clouds” that block out the sun. This is no longer a matter of
debate. The chemtrail “conspiracy theorists,” who were ridiculed for
pointing out that from the mid-90′s onwards contrails from jet planes were
lingering for hours and forming artificial clouds, have been proven correct.
Reading University’s Professor Keith Shine told the Daily Mail that the
clouds “formed by aircraft fumes could linger ‘for hours’, depriving those
areas under busy flight paths, such as London and the Home Counties, of
summer sunshine.”
The report also makes reference to a 2009 Met Office study which found that
high-level winds did not disperse contrails that later formed into clouds
which covered an astonishing 20,000 miles.
As we have documented, geoengineering programs based around the premise of
artificial aerosols were already in operation years ago, including at the
U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Savannah River National Laboratory in
Aiken, S.C, which in 2009 began conducting studies which involved shooting
huge amounts of particulate matter, in this case “porous-walled glass
microspheres,” into the stratosphere.
Another program under the Department of Energy’s Atmospheric Science Program
is directed towards, “developing comprehensive understanding of the
atmospheric processes that control the transport, transformation, and fate
of energy related trace chemicals and particulate matter.”
The DOE website states that, “The current focus of the program is aerosol
radiative forcing of climate: aerosol formation and evolution and aerosol
properties that affect direct and indirect influences on climate and climate
change.”
These programs are already having the effect of blocking out sunlight. The
emergence of the chemtrails phenomenon coincided with an average 22% drop in
sunlight reaching the earth’s surface.
In 2008, a KSLA news investigation found that a substance that fell to earth
from a high altitude chemtrail contained high levels of Barium (6.8 ppm) and
Lead (8.2 ppm) as well as trace amounts of other chemicals including
arsenic, chromium, cadmium, selenium and silver. Of these, all but one are
metals, some are toxic while several are rarely or never found in nature.
The newscast focuses on Barium, which its research shows is a “hallmark of
chemtrails.” KSLA found Barium levels in its samples at 6.8 ppm or “more
than six times the toxic level set by the EPA.” The Louisiana Department of
Environmental Quality confirmed that the high levels of Barium were “very
unusual,” but commented that “proving the source was a whole other matter”
in its discussion with KSLA.
KSLA also asked Mark Ryan, Director of the Poison Control Center, about the
effects of Barium on the human body. Ryan commented that “short term
exposure can lead to anything from stomach to chest pains and that long term
exposure causes blood pressure problems.” The Poison Control Center further
reported that long-term exposure, as with any harmful substance, would
contribute to weakening the immune system.
Spraying sulphur into the upper atmosphere is linked with both environmental
catastrophes and human health problems.
The following health effects are linked with exposure to sulphur.
- Neurological effects and behavioral changes
- Disturbance of blood circulation
- Heart damage
- Effects on eyes and eyesight
- Reproductive failure
- Damage to immune systems
- Stomach and gastrointestinal disorder
- Damage to liver and kidney functions
- Hearing defects
- Disturbance of the hormonal metabolism
- Dermatological effects
- Suffocation and lung embolism
Even pro-geoengineering scientist Mark Watson, admits that injecting sulphur
into the atmosphere could lead to “acid rain, ozone depletion or weather
pattern disruption.”
Rutgers University meteorologist Alan Robock also, “created computer
simulations indicating that sulfate clouds could potentially weaken the
Asian and African summer monsoons, reducing rain that irrigates the food
crops of billions of people.”
“Imagine if we triggered a drought and famine while trying to cool the
planet,” Robock told a geoengineering conference in 2010.
The Canada-based Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC)
has called for such experiments to be shut down. “This experiment is only
phase one of a much bigger plan that could have devastating consequences,
including large changes in weather patterns such as deadly droughts,” the
group said in a written statement.
Fred Singer, president of the Science Environmental Policy Project and a
skeptic of man-made global warming theories, warns that the consequences of
tinkering with the planet’s delicate eco-system could have far-reaching
dangers.
“If you do this on a continuous basis, you would depress the ozone layer and
cause all kinds of other problems that people would rather avoid,” said
Singer.
Even Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist – a staunch advocate of the man-made
global warming explanation – Doug Parr – has slammed attempts to geoengineer
the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous”.

Paul Joseph Watson is the editor and writer for Prison Planet.com. He is the
author of Order Out Of Chaos. Watson is also a regular fill-in host for The
Alex Jones Show and Infowars Nightly News.





†
†
†
ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ
Ras Mikaere Enoch Mc Carty
Maangai Kaawanatanga - Tainui Kiingitanga - Te Aotearoa
http://www.exorcist.org.nz           Ko te Mana Motuhake
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/prime_sinister_john_key.mp3
ﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣﺣ

Taamau Mate:     Ngāti Maniapoto
                           Ngāi Tūhoe
                           Marutūahu
                           Tāmaki
                           Ngāti Toarangatira
                           Te Tau Ihu
                           Hauraki
                           Ngāti Raukawa

'LITTLE OBAMA' - Indonesian Movie Premiere
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/krakatoa.mp3
http://www.exorcist.org.nz/krakatoa_1.mp3