Article View: nz.net.admin
Article #9Re: Activity Report (3 lines of comment)
From: Stephen Judd
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 1997 00:00
60 lines
3279 bytes
3279 bytes
In article <01bc1d4c$2a10df00$7bca1bca@wayne>, "Wayne McDougall" <system@codeworks.gen.nz> wrote: >Stephen Judd <stephen@waikato.ac.nz> wrote in article ><stephen-ya023580001802971046340001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz>... >> In article <01bc1d13$bd3e6ba0$7aca1bca@wayne>, "Wayne McDougall" >> <system@codeworks.gen.nz> wrote: >> >Stephen Judd <stephen@waikato.ac.nz> wrote in article >> ><stephen-ya023580001802970835490001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz>... >> >> Once you've got on a high horse, it is difficult to dismount with >> >dignity, >> >> Wayne, but I suggest you give it a go. >> > >> >Sir. Would you like to suggest just where I have shown any >> >evidence of being on a high horse. >> Sir, with pleasure, sir. >> >> In taking action which has not been called for by others; which has been >> objected to by many; continuing to cancel in the face of reasoned >> opposition from a number of otherwise temperate and moderate regulars >(*); >> and justifying your actions by essentially saying "because I can." > >I find it a unwarranted to claim that I'm on a high horse, because of words >you put in my mouth. A paraphrase. Nowhere have you plainly stated what entitles you to cancel other people's posts, that I can see. I'd be grateful if you reposted or emailed the post to me, if I've missed it. >I have indeed considered it. I know why. Why? I'm really interested to know how you explain why people disagree with you so much. >I also know why I have >stirred up support. Support which has yet to be voiced in public, with the exception of Mike Lopez. (He made some good points, BTW). Support which is invisible to everyone but you, in fact. I understand that you have encouraged people to not post in support of you "in case they are tarred with the brushes that have been prepared for you." Frankly, this is bizarre. I cannot imagine what you think is going to happen to you, or to people who support you. As it is, it appears that you are just being stubborn. Regards Stephen (posted and emailed) -- "I think you've said the opposite of | Stephen Judd, School of Education, what you mean. Assuming that is the | University of Waikato, New Zealand. case, I must disagree, strongly." | <http://poet.soe.waikato.ac.nz/> (Found on sci.lang) | for my PGP key.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<stephen-ya023580001802971701030001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<B.Hamilton.978.101BB014@irl.cri.nz> <VJ3a3D4w165w@codeworks.gen.nz> <331a0664.22170995@news.comp.vuw.ac.nz> <stephen-ya023580001802970835490001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz> <01bc1d13$bd3e6ba0$7aca1bca@wayne> <stephen-ya023580001802971046340001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz> <01bc1d4c$2a10df00$7bca1bca@wayne>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112213,509e31580e40491b X-Google-Attributes: gid112213,public X-Google-Thread: 100250,509e31580e40491b X-Google-Attributes: gid100250,public From: stephen@waikato.ac.nz (Stephen Judd) Subject: Re: Activity Report (3 lines of comment) Date: 1997/02/18 Message-ID: <stephen-ya023580001802971701030001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz> X-Deja-AN: 219525712 Sender: stephen@waikato.ac.nz References: <B.Hamilton.978.101BB014@irl.cri.nz> <VJ3a3D4w165w@codeworks.gen.nz> <331a0664.22170995@news.comp.vuw.ac.nz> <stephen-ya023580001802970835490001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz> <01bc1d13$bd3e6ba0$7aca1bca@wayne> <stephen-ya023580001802971046340001@netserv.waikato.ac.nz> <01bc1d4c$2a10df00$7bca1bca@wayne> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: University of Waikato Mime-Version: 1.0 Reply-To: stephen@waikato.ac.nz Newsgroups: nz.net.admin,aus.net.news