Re: abuse@ihug.co.nz (was Re: The end of the NT OEM debate.)

Article View: nz.wanted

Article #174

#174

From: James
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 1999 00:00

8 lines
1121 bytes

Patrick is right. He shouldn't use that address. But he is also in no place
to try and enforce the rules.

Unless you are an authorised employee, Patrick? (genuine question) If not,
let the right people do the job ok?

Just as the Police don't want Joe Average taking the law into his own hands,
I'm sure IHUG admins don't want usenet subscribers doing the same.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <7l11ud$h53$1@newsource.ihug.co.nz>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mail

References:

<930267182.815942@ham.ihug.co.nz> <MPG.11ddb301c22ba6aa98a282@newsch.es.co.nz> <3772F776.74899ADE@eudoramail.com> <MPG.11ddfebae7639f9f98a291@newsch.es.co.nz>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 102693,8a22116bc0602a5d
X-Google-Attributes: gid102693,public
X-Google-Thread: 108bca,a85cde3d8b6a60a0
X-Google-Attributes: gid108bca,public
From: "James" <smithies@ihug.co.nzZZZ>
Subject: Re: abuse@ihug.co.nz (was Re: The end of the NT OEM debate.)
Date: 1999/06/26
Message-ID: <7l11ud$h53$1@newsource.ihug.co.nz>
X-Deja-AN: 493950323
References: <930267182.815942@ham.ihug.co.nz> <MPG.11ddb301c22ba6aa98a282@newsch.es.co.nz> <3772F776.74899ADE@eudoramail.com> <MPG.11ddfebae7639f9f98a291@newsch.es.co.nz>
X-Priority: 3
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Organization: The Internet Group Ltd
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Newsgroups: nz.wanted,ihug.general

Reply to Parent Message