🚀 go-pugleaf

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Behold, on Sun, 27 Jun 1999 02:17:02 +1200 in
nz.wanted:<930406090.221072@ham.ihug.co.nz>, Nothing. (a@b.c.d) didst
uttereth:

>
>>Patrick is right. He shouldn't use that address. But he is also in no place
>>to try and enforce the rules.
>>
>>Unless you are an authorised employee, Patrick? (genuine question) If not,
>>let the right people do the job ok?
>
>By posting it here I am drawing their attention to it.
>
>>
>>Just as the Police don't want Joe Average taking the law into his own
>hands,
>>I'm sure IHUG admins don't want usenet subscribers doing the same.
>
>I haven't actually done anything except question the use of the address and
>suggest that he changes it.
>
>Oh dear Patrick.
>
>Looks like there is a little war over your end of the ballpark.  Helpful
>hint.  If you feel the sudden need to publically question someone's choice
>of EMail address, then maybe you should quickly think of the reprocusions...

If you use someone's address or name to which you are not entitled to use,
you can expect sparks to fly.

Using an official Ihug address may erroneously give the impression that you
are a representative of Ihug.

- -- 
Patrick Dunford, Christchurch, NZ
http://patrick.dunford.com/ 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.0.2i

iQA/AwUBN3UlBZ/ufSMMVdBMEQLUpwCgxqeKv6ozSb/+HJHIAcGXEVY/wMwAn35W
U3KsV8JFkBnJoBD9QUz5ZyW2
=q0Tx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----