Article View: oh.cast
Article #16Re: What do we think info-port should be?
From: michael.a.weinstein
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:05
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:05
56 lines
3370 bytes
3370 bytes
What should an infoport be (especially when the people responsible for the designation don't know or won't tell you)? I have seen some postings already concerning this, both on a macro (what should an infoport be or do) and micro (e.g., should certain technologies be deployed) level. With the current state of thought so ill-defined, I believe that it is important to stay on the macro level for now; the specific technologies necessary to support the infoport should follow naturally from a more concrete definition of what the infoport is. My thoughts follow: 1. A key enabler of the infoport would be to set it up as a telecommunications free trade zone with lower tariffs for traffic coming into or out of the zone. This would encourage its use (as opposed to another city/region) and its economic development in general. Information created in certain offshore areas (Mexico or the Caribbean basin, for example) could also be given preferential treatment. 2. The infoport should be a global and/or regional information exchange point, housing the applications and services necessary to support this information exchange. It is key that procedures be established with the UN, and anyone else willing to abide by them, that information services provided by the infoport not be duplicated elsewhere (e.g., by another state or city that didn't receive the designation but wants to be an infoport anyway). 3. The infoport should be a regional information repository (e.g., for UN, national, and international data). Mechanisms should be put into place for all interested users to access the data. 4. Ohio must think big - with a 2 year franchise and other cities out to get the franchise, Ohio must establish a dominant position rather than targeting limited niches. 5. Ohio and the UN (especially the latter) must make it clear as to why using a designated infoport is better than using a non-infoport (e.g., better tariffs, taxes, services, information storage and access, etc.) 6. Maximum benefit for the citizens of Ohio should be realized. While this applies in an economic sense, it also applies in an information technology sense, too. That is, any applicable information services developed for the infoport should be offered to Ohio's citizens, too. In this way, the development of the global infoport can be leveraged for local benefit, too. Also, are there any UN documents available about the infoport designation? Since they are promoting the concept, there must be some documentation somewhere (if for no other reason than to give the UN something to vote on in the first place and to establish criteria for selecting infoports). Mike Weinstein Room 1F-331A, AT&T Bell Laboratories, Holmdel, NJ 07733-3030 908-949-2080 maw@arch1.att.com or attmail!maweinstein
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep11.140510.2154@cbnewsh.cb.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!bgsuvax!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!cbnewsh!mawReferences:
<1992Aug29.003016.28964@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!uoft02.utoledo.edu!bgsuvax!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!att-out!cbnewsh!maw Newsgroups: oh.cast Subject: Re: What do we think info-port should be? Message-ID: <1992Sep11.140510.2154@cbnewsh.cb.att.com> From: maw@cbnewsh.cb.att.com (michael.a.weinstein) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1992 14:05:10 GMT References: <1992Aug29.003016.28964@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Distribution: oh Organization: AT&T Summary: More Thoughts on Columbus as an Infoport Lines: 56